ENTSOG GRIP BEMIP 2014-2023 / Main Report
F I N L A N D
Imatra
D N 5 0 0 / 4 0 0
27.82 mcm/d
90
Hameenlinna
D N 5 0 0
20.86
D N 70 0 Lappeenranta Kouvola
Lahti
D N 7 0 0
D N 9 0 0
DN 7 0 0
Mantsala
DN 500
Vyborg
Turku
Porvoo
DN 500
Kotka
D N 4 0 0 DN 500/400
Lohja
DN 500
D N 4 0 0
Vousaari
Primorsk Baltic LNG
HELSINKI
Espoo
6.96
Finngulf
G u l f o f F i n l a n d
Hanko
St. Petersburg
8.65
0
27.7 bar 28.5 bar
Narva
DN 500
DN 500
1.69
DN 700
D N 2 0 0
DN 700
TALLINN
BALTICCONNECTOR
8.44 mcm/d
Paldiski
27.3 bar
E S T O N I A
D N 5 0 0
D N 7 00
Novgorod
DN 250
4.82
1.93
33.2 bar
Pärnu
Karksi
Pskov
55
102
Värska
33.4 bar
G u l f o f R i g a
Misso
Izborsk
N O RD STREAM
91
4.8
DN 700
Korneti
DN 700
12.6 mcm/d
DN 700
R U S S I A
40.0 bar
24.15
Inčukalns UGS
RĪGA lecava
L AT V I A
DN 700
Rēzekne
DN 500
DN 500/350
Liepāja
DN 500
37.7 bar
DN 700 56
Kieménai
0
DN 1000/350
Daugavpils
4.25
DN 700
DN 300
Śiauliai
17.0 mcm/d
DN 700
Klaipeda
DN 500/350
Klaipeda
Visaginas
L I T H U A N I A
DN 400
DN 500
Jurbarkas
DN 700
7.0 mcm/d
DN 700/350
Kaunas
Jauniunai
57
DN 700/500
Šakiai
Kotlovka
YA M A L
92
7.0
Kaliningrad
VILNIUS
15.10
4.65
DN 700
MINSK
B E L A R U S
GI P L
P O L A N D
Tietierowka
93
Figure 3.3: Gas flows in normal cold winter business day, 2020 (Legend see page 50)
For winter 2020 case of normal winter day and 20 disruption scenarios were analysed. Hereby 3 disruption scenarios are shown as examples: disruption from Kotlovka, Inkoo LNG terminal and Inčukalns UGS. The results of the modeling clear- ly show that robustness of the East-Baltic joint system after implementation of all projects assessed in the Study is significantly increased and the gas flows can be rearranged in a way that no country is experiencing significant gas deficit in case of gas supply disruptions.
Baltic Energy Market Interconnection Plan GRIP 2014–2023 | 53
Made with FlippingBook