ENTSOG GRIP BEMIP 2014-2023 / Main Report

F I N L A N D

Imatra

D N 5 0 0 / 4 0 0

27.82 mcm/d

90

Hameenlinna

D N 5 0 0

20.86

D N 70 0 Lappeenranta Kouvola

Lahti

D N 7 0 0

D N 9 0 0

DN 7 0 0

Mantsala

DN 500

Vyborg

Turku

Porvoo

DN 500

Kotka

D N 4 0 0 DN 500/400

Lohja

DN 500

D N 4 0 0

Vousaari

Primorsk Baltic LNG

HELSINKI

Espoo

6.96

Finngulf

G u l f o f F i n l a n d

Hanko

St. Petersburg

8.65

0

27.7 bar 28.5 bar

Narva

DN 500

DN 500

1.69

DN 700

D N 2 0 0

DN 700

TALLINN

BALTICCONNECTOR

8.44 mcm/d

Paldiski

27.3 bar

E S T O N I A

D N 5 0 0

D N 7 00

Novgorod

DN 250

4.82

1.93

33.2 bar

Pärnu

Karksi

Pskov

55

102

Värska

33.4 bar

G u l f o f R i g a

Misso

Izborsk

N O RD STREAM

91

4.8

DN 700

Korneti

DN 700

12.6 mcm/d

DN 700

R U S S I A

40.0 bar

24.15

Inčukalns UGS

RĪGA lecava

L AT V I A

DN 700

Rēzekne

DN 500

DN 500/350

Liepāja

DN 500

37.7 bar

DN 700 56

Kieménai

0

DN 1000/350

Daugavpils

4.25

DN 700

DN 300

Śiauliai

17.0 mcm/d

DN 700

Klaipeda

DN 500/350

Klaipeda

Visaginas

L I T H U A N I A

DN 400

DN 500

Jurbarkas

DN 700

7.0 mcm/d

DN 700/350

Kaunas

Jauniunai

57

DN 700/500

Šakiai

Kotlovka

YA M A L

92

7.0

Kaliningrad

VILNIUS

15.10

4.65

DN 700

MINSK

B E L A R U S

GI P L

P O L A N D

Tietierowka

93

Figure 3.3: Gas flows in normal cold winter business day, 2020 (Legend see page 50)

For winter 2020 case of normal winter day and 20 disruption scenarios were analysed. Hereby 3 disruption scenarios are shown as examples: disruption from Kotlovka, Inkoo LNG terminal and Inčukalns UGS. The results of the modeling clear- ly show that robustness of the East-Baltic joint system after implementation of all projects assessed in the Study is significantly increased and the gas flows can be rearranged in a way that no country is experiencing significant gas deficit in case of gas supply disruptions.

Baltic Energy Market Interconnection Plan GRIP 2014–2023 | 53