ENTSOG GRIP BEMIP 2014-2023 / Main Report

F I N L A N D

Imatra

27.82 mcm/d

90

Hameenlinna

20.86

Lappeenranta Kouvola

Lahti

Mantsala

Vyborg

Turku

Porvoo

Kotka

Lohja

Vousaari

Primorsk Baltic LNG

HELSINKI

Espoo

6.96

Finngulf

G u l f o f F i n l a n d

Hanko

St. Petersburg

17.95

bar 25.5 41.1

0

33.7 bar

Narva

10.99

TALLINN

8.44 mcm/d

BALTICCONNECTOR

Paldiski

32.2 bar

E S T O N I A

2.58

Novgorod

0.03

32.0 bar

Pärnu

Karksi

Pskov

55

102

Värska

33.2 bar

G u l f o f R i g a

Misso

Izborsk

N O RD STREAM

91

0

Korneti

12.6 mcm/d

R U S S I A

0

31.6 bar

-0.85 mcm/d

Inčukalns UGS

RĪGA lecava

L AT V I A

Rēzekne

Liepāja

35.7 bar

56

Kieménai

9.2

Daugavpils

11.0

Śiauliai

17.0 mcm/d

Klaipeda

Klaipeda

Visaginas

L I T H U A N I A

Jurbarkas

7.0 mcm/d

Kaunas

Jauniunai

57

Šakiai

Kotlovka

YA M A L

92

7.0

Kaliningrad

VILNIUS

15.10

7.1

MINSK

B E L A R U S

GI P L

P O L A N D

Tietierowka

93

Figure 3.6: Disruption scenario – gas flow disruption from Inčukalns UGS and possible gas flows in order to minimize gas deficit, 2020 (Legend see page 50)

Since after implementation of the project of modernization of Inčukalns UGS the largest infrastructure of the East-Baltic region with the technical capacity of 35mcm/ day is becoming Inčukalns UGS, in case of failure of this facility results of modeling show that Latvia still may experience some gas deficit, and it is possible that this kind of gas supply disruption can adversary influence also Estonia. How­ ever, in case gas is available from Russia all countries of the region are fully supplied.

56 |

Baltic Energy Market Interconnection Plan GRIP 2014–2023