Balkan Vital Graphics
46
BALKAN VITAL GRAPHICS
BACKGROUND
MINING
WATER
NATURE
47
Prior to 1992, there were only six international river basins in the Balkans, but after the break-up of former Yugoslavia, the number more than doubled. There are now 13 internationally shared river basins and four transboundary lake basins. Such a fragmented situation means that new international legal regimes specifically for water basins need to be worked out. Talks between the countries concerned are also essential to develop future policies on hy- droelectric power generation.
Ta ş i
Szombathely
Piatra Neam ţ
Székesfehérvár
Z ă lau
Graz
CHI Ş IN Ă U
Veszprém
Tighina Tiraspol
Bistri ţ a
A U S T R I A
Roman
Kecskemét
U K R A I N E
Zalaegerszeg
M O L D O V A
Cluj-Napoca
Dunaújváros
Odessa
S i r e t
B a l a t o n
Klagenfurt
Villach
Bac ă u
Vaslui
Békéscaba
H U N G A R Y
Târgu Mure ş
Bârlad
Turda
Maribor
Hódmez ő vásárhely
Kaposvár
S L O V E N I A
R O M A N I A
One ş ti
Szeged
Udine
P r u t
Arad
Sfântu Gheorghe
Alba Iulia
Pécs
Media ş
LJUBLJANA
D r a v a
M u r e ş u l
Deva
Foc ş ani
ZAGREB
Subotica
T i s a
Sibiu
Timi ş oara
Bra ş ov
Gala ţ i
Trieste
Lugoj
D u n a v
Izmayil
C R O A T I A
K o l p a
Hunedoara
Osijek
Petro ş ani
K u p a
Karlovac
Br ă ila
Zrenjanin
S a v a
Rijeka
Tulgea
Novi Sad
Buz ă u
SlavonskiBrod
Râmnicu Vâlcea
Re ş i ţ a
Târgoviste
Târgu Jiu
Ploie ş ti
S a v a
Republika Srpska
Pan č evo
Pula
Slobozia
Drobeta- Turnu Severin
Pite ş ti
Banja Luka
Br č ko
BEOGRAD
U n a
BUCURE Ş TI
B O S N I A -
Br č ko
Constan ţ a
Slatina
C ă l ă ra ş i
Tuzla
Smederevska Palanka
V r b a s
B o s n a
Craiova
O l t
Zenica
Silistra
S E R B I A
D r i n a
Zadar
Bor
Alexandria Giurgiu
H E R Z E G O V I N A
C e t i n a A D R I A T I C S E A Split
Ruse
Po ž ega
Vidin
D u n ă r e a
SARAJEVO
Ancona
Dobrich
Razgrad
Federacija Bosna i Hercegovina
Pleven
Montana
Ni š
Mostar
Varna
Shumen
Vratsa
B L A C K
NoviPazar
R.S.
VelikoT ŭ rnovo
Lovech
N e r e t v a
AscoliPiceno
BijeloPolje
B U L G A R I A
Leskovac
MONTENEGRO
Teramo
Sliven
SOFIYA
T u n d z h a
Gabrovo
Pri š tina
Burgas
M o r a č a
S E A
Pescara
L'Aquila
Yambol
Dubrovnik
Pernik
K o s o v o
Stara-Zagora
Chieti
Plovdiv
Pazardzhik
PODGORICA
Dimitrovgrad
Kyustendil
M a r i t s a
Shkodër
SKOPJE
D r i n
Khaskovo
Asenovgrad
Bar
Edirne
Blagoevgrad
Tetovo Gostivar
SanSevero
V a r d a r
K ŭ rdzhali
Veles
D r i n i i Z i
Establishing international cooperation on water resources Many bilateral and multilateral treaties concerning water resources in the Balkans were concluded in the second half of the 20th century. In particular, the former Yugoslavia was keen to develop such partnerships, in keeping with its position as a non-aligned country in a divided world and its commitment to peaceful co-ex- istence and friendship between peoples. In addition, water treaties paved the way for further development.
M e s t a
S t r u m a
Lüleburgaz
A r d a
Manfredonia Barletta
E r g e n e
Campobasso
M A C E D O N I A
Çorlu
Foggia
Istanbul
TIRANË
Kad ı köy
N e s t o s
İ zmit
Benevento
Tekirda ğ
Durrës
Bari
Serres
E v r o s
Ohrid
Kartal
Bitola
Avellino
Kavala
The treaties generally set up joint commissions. Some of them are still at work. The Danube Commission, for instance, was established under the Belgrade Conven- tion on the Danube Navigation Regime in 1948. Apart from international waters, former Yugoslavia also had to manage its national waters divided be- tween the various federal units – six republics and two autonomous provinces. Water compacts be- tween these units had a constitutional and legal ba- sis. A good example of this type of legal instrument is the compact governing use of the Trebižat River watershed, agreed by Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia. It remains an open question why such an excellent example of intra-state cooperation was not fully implemented. The fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 marked the end of a divided Europe and a bipolar world. New activities led to several multilateral environmental agreements. Almost all of them concern transboundary waters in one way or
Napoli
S t r i m o n a s
I T A L Y
Yalova
A L B A N I A
A x i o s
Salerno
Thessaloniki
Torre del Greco
Matera
Brindisi
Gemlik
Korçë
Potenza
Band ı rma
Bursa
Kastoria
Vlorë
Taranto
Lecce
Çanakkale
Bal ı kesir
G R E E C E
T U R K E Y
Larisa
Ioannina
Kerkyra
Cosenza
Volos
A G E A N
Akhisar
Crotone
Arta
Lamia
Manisa
U ş ak
Lamezia
Catanzaro
Salihli
S E A
İ zmir
Ödermi ş
Source:ZinkeEnvironmentConsulting/Fluvius
The treaties established cooperation between national authorities responsible for water management, with a view to improving their ability to deal with challenges arising in shared river basins. Typical concerns includ- ed floods, drainage, the construction of dams and hy- droelectric power plants, shipping and fishery. Water pollution was also an issue, often with the specific pur- pose of reducing the amount of pollution discharged into the water to protect fish or allowing fish species such as the Danube sturgeon to migrate freely. How- ever, although legislation on pollution and migration existed, it was often not enforced.
Contrary to the situation in the 1950s and 1960s, there are now several internationally accepted policy and legal instruments such as the Stockholm Dec- laration (1972) or the Rio Declaration (1992). Along- side the UNECE international instruments mentioned below, they constitute an overall framework for new legal regimes between states, old and new, covering the management of international water resources.
another. Several new treaties were signed in Kiev in 2003 in an effort to introduce more detailed regulations.
Following the conflicts of the 1990s and the breakup of former Yugoslavia, six new countries emerged in the Bal- kans. In addition to creating new states, former national water resources now are of concern to several countries, creating the need for specific international rules.
Made with FlippingBook