2015.14 Vitamin B (July 2018)
2015.14 (JULY 2018) BVit‐02 Total Bs ERP Evaluation Form
FOR ERP USE ONLY DO NOT DISTRIBUTE
Accuracy ‐ Analytical bias compared to reference material Certified Reference Material
Table 2
Measured Results
T stat Bias
Confidence interval
CRM product
Analyte
Certified value Uncertainty Certified range Concentration Difference from certified value
p ‐value
Nominal
234.0 220.5 230.1 222.5 236.4 235.6 235.2 244.4 210.1 210.6 220.6 224.8 227.1
‐30.3 ‐16.8 ‐26.4 ‐18.8 ‐32.7 ‐31.9 ‐31.5 ‐40.7
SRM 1849a
Riboflavin (ug/100g)
203.7
5.2
198.5 ‐ 208.9
23.4
7.579
0.000
220.3 ‐ 233.9
‐6.4 ‐6.9
‐16.9 ‐21.1 ‐23.4 10.7
Mean
SD
10.7
d
T stat =
/ sd
n
where: = mean of the differences between measured results and reference value sd = standard deviation of the differences between results and reference value n = number of replicate analyses of SRM d
H 0 : = 0, The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between the measured results and the certified value:
d
p ‐value: is the probability (at the 95% levels of confidence) of obtaining the test statistic assuming that the null hypothesis is true p ‐value < 0.05 indicate a difference of statistical signifance between measured results and SRM.
95% confidence interval: The true population of the measured value expected to fall within the confidence interval estimate 95% of the time
sd
sd
t crit
t crit
lower limit = mean ‐
upper limit = mean +
n
n
crit t
where: = critical values of the t‐distribution
sd = standard deviation of the differences between results an reference value n = number of replicate analyses of SRM
Made with FlippingBook Online newsletter