UCL Handbook 2015 2016

Alertness & Awareness: (Maximum Mark 10)

Be proactive and not reactive, intervene early to sort out problems. Retain visual contact with players involved in original challenge, whilst aware of the next phase of play Manage Injuries in accordance with law Display the understanding when to raise the profile to suit mood of the game

Communication: (Maximum Mark 10)

Make effective use of both voice and whistle. Demonstrate the use of the “stepped approach” (ie the quiet word, obvious word, public rebuke, Yellow/Red card). Support decisions with clear signals (for the benefit of players and spectators) to clarify and show confidence in decision making. Differentiate between direct & indirect free kick and restart game correctly.

Teamwork: (Maximum Mark 10)

Encourage and support Assistant Referees Maintain a team approach when accepting or declining advice offered, particularly in relation to offside decisions which may not be obvious to spectators or persons in the technical areas.

Advantage: (Maximum Mark 10)

Distinguish between advantage and mere possession of the ball. Position on the field of play and ability of players to make use of the advantage clause. Prepared to bring play back when advantage does not accrue “Sell” the advantage clause by use of correct visual & verbal signals.

Overall Match Control: (Maximum Mark 25)

Identify the mood, temperature & tensions within the game & effect solutions before it escalates. Inspire respect through sensitive management of players Demonstrate and implement a flexible game plan in keeping with the changing demands of the game. Appear confident and at ease, approach players correctly, and deal with them in a positive manner. Understanding of acceptable application of law. Demonstrate consistency within the individual game i.e. administer the same punishment throughout for the same type of offence committed by either team.

AWARDING THE MARK

Mark

Comment

95+ This official demonstrated very accurate decision-making and controlled the game totally exceptional.

85 to 94 This official has confidence in the level of accuracy with accurate decisions & correct Law Interpretation. 75 to 84 This official has a confident approach to the decision making process with accuracy in the vast majority of those decision 70 to 74 Expected standard of performance from referees 60 to 69 This reflects the need for further development to achieve standard expected. 50 to 59 This reflects poor performance where most aspects need improvement. 49 and be- low Major deficiencies witnessed. This official demonstrated shortcomings in the accuracy of decision-making and control which affected the game.

60

Made with