or is it simply structural issue? Give me a call to discuss. > > Thanks, >
> Brian P. Mock > (646) 891-9296 > > From: Francesca Meola > > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2019 5:38 PM > To: Mock, Brian > > Cc: Trause, Zachary >; Bilgen, Murat >; Dany Chehade > > Subject: RE: Concourse B Bridge: Approver Peter Costanzo Updated their Response for Submittal (#PedBB- 0411.0: PedBB - Blue Banger Hangers) > > [External Email] > ________________________________ > Brian, > > We don’t want to hang anything directly from the roof metal deck - please refer to our general notes: > [cid:image001.jpg@01D54616.A26EC190] > We have a detail that can work and that was used in the HH. > I will call you tomorrow. > > Francesca > > FRANCESCA MEOLA > HOK > Francesca.Meola@hok.com > t +1 646 385 7622 > > > hok.com | connect | privacy policy > > From: Mock, Brian [mailto:brian.mock@skanskawalsh.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2019 4:52 PM > To: Francesca Meola > > Cc: Trause, Zachary >; Bilgen, Murat > > Subject: FW: Concourse B Bridge: Approver Peter Costanzo Updated their Response for Submittal (#PedBB- 0411.0: PedBB - Blue Banger Hangers) > > Francesca – Is there a specific reason structurally why the blue banger hangers are rejected for gyp board ceiling use on roof deck for the substitution request? I am a little confused by the comments on page 10 as the this product data is to be used separately from detail 23/A82-01 and the product data states it is designed for 20ga minimum metal decking so the screws should be designed to tension. > > Before I send back to subcontractor I just want to verify the reasoning behind rejecting the product data. > > Thank you, > > Brian P. Mock