Terminating the Employment Relationship

25 Wilkerson v. City of Placentia (1981) 118 Cal.App.3d 435, 443–444 [173 Cal.Rptr. 294]. 26 Code Civ. Proc., § 1021.5. 27 Otto v. Los Angeles Unified School Dist. (2003) 106 Cal.App.4th 328 [130 Cal.Rptr.2d 512], as modified (Feb. 14, 2003) . 28 Jenkins v. County of Riverside (2006) 138 Cal.App.4th 593 [41 Cal.Rptr.3d 686]. 29 Shoemaker v. Myers (1990) 52 Cal.3d 1 [276 Cal.Rptr. 303, 801 P.2d 1054]; Kemmerer v. County of Fresno (1988) 200 Cal.App.3d 1426 [246 Cal.Rptr. 609]. 30 Kemmerer v. County of Fresno (1988) 200 Cal.App.3d 1426 [246 Cal.Rptr. 609]. 31 Stillwell v. The Salvation Army (2008) 167 Cal.App.4th 360 [84 Cal.Rptr.3d 111]. 32 Allen v. City of Beverly Hills (9th Cir. 1990) 911 F.2d 367 [In Allen , the court relied heavily on an ordinance precluding oral contracts of employment in deciding that an exempt employee did not have a property interest in his position]. 33 Bush v. California Conservation Corps (1982) 136 Cal.App.3d 194 [185 Cal.Rptr. 892]. 34 review den . 35 Barthuli v. Board of Trustees (1977) 19 Cal.3d 717 [139 Cal.Rptr. 627, 566 P.2d 261]. 36 Gov. Code, §§ 12900-12966. 37 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. 38 Harris v. City of Santa Monica (2013) 56 Cal.4th 203 [152 Cal.Rptr.3d 392, 294 P.3d 49], rehg.den. 39 Yanowitz v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. (2005) 36 Cal.4th 1028 [32 Cal.Rptr.3d 436, 116 P.3d 1123]; Gov. Code, § 12940, subd.(h). 40 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a). 41 Walters v. Metropolitan Educational Enterprises, Inc. (1997) 519 U.S. 202 [117 S.Ct. 660, 136 L.Ed.2d 644]. 42 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(l). 43 Stegall v. Citadel Broadcasting Co. (9th Cir. 2003) 350 F.3d 1061, as amended (Jan. 6, 2004) . 44 Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. White (2006) 548 U.S. 53 [126 S.Ct. 2405, 165 L.Ed.2d 345]. 45 Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. White (2006) 548 U.S. 53 [126 S.Ct. 2405, 165 L.Ed.2d 345]. 46 Lab. Code, § 245.5,(c); Gov. Code, § 12945,(a) 47 Waters v. Churchill (1994) 511 U.S. 661 [114 S.Ct. 1878, 128 L.Ed.2d 686], motion den. by 513 U.S. 804 [115 S.Ct. 49]. 48 Garcetti v. Ceballos (2006) 547 U.S. 410 [126 S.Ct. 1951, 164 L.Ed.2d 689]. 49 Hernandez v. Spacelabs Medical Inc. (9th Cir. 2003) 343 F.3d 1107. 50 Thornbrough v. Western Placer Unified School Dist. (2013) 223 Cal.App.4th 169 [167 Cal.Rptr.3d 24]. 51 Judson Steel Corp. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (1978) 22 Cal.3d 658 [150 Cal.Rptr. 250, 586 P.2d 564], [Court held that the employee's loss of seniority, after being on an extended leave of absence due to an industrial injury, constituted discrimination under Lab. Code, § 132a]. 52 Gov. Code, § 3502.1. 53 Ellins v. City of Sierra Madre (9th Cir. 2013) 710 F.3d 1049. 54 Edgerly v. City of Oakland (2012) 211 Cal.App.4th 1191 [150 Cal.Rptr.3d 425], as modified (Dec. 13, 2012) 55 Gardenhire v. Housing Authority (2000) 85 Cal.App.4th 236 [101 Cal.Rptr.2d 893], rehg. & review den.

Terminating the Employment Relationship ©2019 (s) Liebert Cassidy Whitmore 132

Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online