Terminating the Employment Relationship

56 Lab. Code, § 1103, rehg. & review den.; McVeigh v. Recology San Francisco (2013) 213 Cal.App.4th 443 [152 Cal.Rptr.3d 595]. 57 Akers v. County of San Diego (2002) 95 Cal.App.4th 1441, 1456–1457 [116 Cal.Rptr.2d 602]. 58 Southern Cal. Rapid Transit Dist. v. Superior Court (1994) 30 Cal.App.4th 713, 724 [36 Cal.Rptr.2d 665], as modified (Dec. 1, 1994) . 59 LeVine v. Weis (2001) 90 Cal.App.4th 201, 210 [108 Cal.Rptr.2d 562], as modified on denial of reh'g (July 25, 2001) disapproved of by Wells v. One2One Learning Foundation (2006) 39 Cal.4th 1164 [48 Cal.Rptr.3d 108, 141 P.3d 225], rehg. den. 60 Campbell v. Regents of University of California (2005) 35 Cal.4th 311, 325 [25 Cal.Rptr.3d 320, 106 P.3d 976], cert. den. by 546 U.S. 938 [126 S.Ct. 428]. 61 Gov. Code, § 12653, subd. (b); State ex rel. Bowen v. Bank of America Corp. (2005) 126 Cal.App.4th 225, 237 [23 Cal.Rptr.3d 746], rehg. & review den. 62 31 U.S.C. § 3730(h). 63 Mendiondo v. Centinela Hosp. Medical Center (9th Cir. 2008) 521 F.3d 1097. 64 Thorne v. City of El Segundo (9th Cir. 1983) 726 F.2d 459, cert. den . (1984) 469 U.S. 979, appeal after remand (1986) 802 F.2d 1131. 65 Lab. Code, § 96, subd. (k). 66 Barbee v. Household Automotive Finance Corp. (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 525 [6 Cal.Rptr.3d 406]. 67 Grinzi v. San Diego Hospice Corp. (2004) 120 Cal.App.4th 72 [14 Cal.Rptr.3d 893], rehg. den. 68 Edgerton v. State Personnel Bd. (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 1350 [100 Cal.Rptr.2d 491], rehg. & review den. 69 Garrison v. Department of Justice (Fed. Cir. 1995) 72 F.3d 1566, cert. den. by (1996) 519 U.S. 948 [117 S.Ct. 358]. 70 The Federal Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (42 U.S.C. § 12114(c)(1), (2), and (3)); California Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1990 (Gov. Code, §§ 8350-8357). (§§ 8350.1 to 8350.9. Repealed by Stats.1968, c. 1352, § 1). 71 Holliday v. City of Modesto (1991) 229 Cal.App.3d 528 [280 Cal.Rptr. 206]; Compare, 80 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 354, (1997) [California Attorney General issued an opinion that a district attorney may order a deputy district attorney to submit to an individual suspicion-based drug test in the absence of a pre-established policy regarding such testing. Further, the establishment by a district attorney of a policy regarding individual suspicion-based drug testing of deputy district attorneys would not be the subject of mandatory collective bargaining negotiations]. 72 Hernandez v. Hillsides, Inc. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 272 [97 Cal.Rptr.3d 274, 211 P.3d 1063]. 73 Quon v. Arch Wireless Operating Co., Inc. (9th Cir. 2008) 529 F.3d 892, rev'd and remanded sub nom. City of Ontario, Cal. v. Quon (2010) 560 U.S. 746 [130 S.Ct. 2619, 177 L.Ed.2d 216]. 74 29 C.F.R. § 1630.9 (Appendix). 75 Gov. Code, § 12940, subd. (n). 76 Barnett v. U.S. Air, Inc. (9th Cir. 2000) 228 F.3d 1105, 1115, vacated sub nom. U.S. Airways, Inc. v. Barnett (2002) 535 U.S. 391 [122 S.Ct. 1516, 152 L.Ed.2d 589]. 77 See Barnett v. U.S. Air, Inc. (9th Cir. 2000) 228 F.3d 1105, vacated sub nom. Gov. Code, § 12940, subd. (m) ( citing EEOC Enforcement Guidance: Reasonable Accommodation and Undue Hardship Under the Americans with Disabilities Act, EEOC Compliance Manual (CCH), section 902, No. 915.002 (March 1, 1999), at 5438, 5440 and 5459). 78 Humphrey v. Memorial Hospitals Ass'n (9th Cir. 2001) 239 F.3d 1128.

Terminating the Employment Relationship ©2019 (s) Liebert Cassidy Whitmore 133

Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online