Terminating the Employment Relationship

220 Lab. Code, § 4850.4. 221 Lab. Code, § 4850.4. 222 Gov. Code, § 21164. 223 Gov. Code, § 21163. 224 Gov. Code, § 31724. 225 Lab. Code, § 4850.3. 226 Lab. Code, § 4850.4. 227 Lab. Code, § 4850.3. 228 Gov. Code, § 21164. 229 City of Martinez v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (2000) 85 Cal.App.4th 601 [102 Cal.Rptr.2d 588], review den. 230 Gov. Code, § 21163. 231 Mahler v. City of Buena Park (1991) 1 Cal.App.4th 705, 710 [2 Cal.Rptr.2d 312, 315] [the fact that the employer also precludes the cash-out of accumulated sick leave does not preclude the right of the employee to use accrued sick leave prior to the effective date of disability retirement]. 232 Mahler v. City of Buena Park (1991) 1 Cal.App.4th 705, 710 [2 Cal.Rptr.2d 312, 315]. 233 Andersen v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (2007) 149 Cal.App.4th 1369, 1380 [57 Cal.Rptr.3d 839, 847–848]. 234 Gov. Code, § 31724; Katosh v. Sonoma County Employees' Retirement Assn. (2008) 163 Cal.App.4th 56 [77 Cal.Rptr.3d 324]; Astorga v. Retirement Board of the Santa Barbara County Employees Retirement System (2016) 245 Cal.App.4th 386 [199 Cal.Rptr.3d 379]. 235 Puckett v. Orange County Bd. of Retirement (1988) 201 Cal.App.3d 1075 [247 Cal.Rptr. 672]. 236 Gov. Code, § 31724. 237 Puckett v. Orange County Bd. of Retirement (1988) 201 Cal.App.3d 1075 [247 Cal.Rptr. 672]. 238 Katosh v. Sonoma County Employees' Retirement Assn. (2008) 163 Cal.App.4th 56 [77 Cal.Rptr.3d 324]. 239 Mahler v. City of Buena Park (1991) 1 Cal.App.4th 705 [2 Cal.Rptr.2d 312]. 240 Andersen v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (2007) 149 Cal.App.4th 1369 [57 Cal.Rptr.3d 839]. 241 The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 only applies to federal employers and governmental agencies that receive federal financial assistance. 242 42 U.S.C. § 12112; Gov. Code, § 12940(a) 243 29 C.F.R. § 1630.9; Gov. Code, § 12940, subds. (m), (n). 244 Stuessel v. City of Glendale (1983) 141 Cal.App.3d 1047, 1051 [190 Cal.Rptr. 773, 775–776]; Harmon v. Board of Retirement (1976) 62 Cal.App.3d 689, 695 [133 Cal.Rptr. 154, 159–160]. 245 Lazan v. County of Riverside (2006) 140 Cal.App.4th 453 [44 Cal.Rptr.3d 394], review den. 246 See Roccaforte v. City of San Diego (1979) 89 Cal.App.3d 877 [152 Cal.Rptr. 558] [This is not a PERS agency, but the reasoning of the case can be extended to PERS employers in the absence of other statutory or case law]. 247 Gov. Code, § 31725; See also Phillips v. County of Fresno (1990) 225 Cal.App.3d 1240, 1258 [277 Cal.Rptr. 531, 541–542], review den. 248 Phillips v. County of Fresno (1990) 225 Cal.App.3d 1240, 1257 [277 Cal.Rptr. 531, 541], review den. 249 Stephens v. County of Tulare (2006) 38 Cal.4th 793 [43 Cal.Rptr.3d 302, 134 P.3d 288]; Kelly v. County of Los Angeles (2006) 141 Cal.App.4th 910 [46 Cal.Rptr.3d 335]. 250 Stephens v. County of Tulare (2006) 38 Cal.4th 793 [43 Cal.Rptr.3d 302, 134 P.3d 288].

Terminating the Employment Relationship ©2019 (s) Liebert Cassidy Whitmore 139