JAVS Spring 2026

Figure 4. Stepanov, Three Miniatures , III (Waltz), mm.1-11, intimate texture.

that it raises the unsettling question of whether such a composer existed at all. An extensive investigation conducted by historian and violist Teresa Rupp yielded more questions than answers. 29 Even basic biographical details—including Stepanova’s full name, place of origin or residence, and date of birth—remain uncertain. Some Russian databases list her birth year as 1945, an impossibility given that Poem was published in 1950. 30 One website even circulated a portrait that, upon closer examination, turned out to depict a different woman of the same name with no connection to music. Rupp proposes several plausible hypotheses regarding Stepanova’s fate, grounded in what is known about musical life in the USSR during the mid-twentieth century; nevertheless, these remain speculative in the absence of further evidence. 31 This degree of anonymity should not be understood merely as a biographical curiosity or archival accident, but rather as an outcome consistent with the ideological and institutional mechanisms of socialist realism itself. Within a system that privileged typified output over individual authorship and rewarded conformity over distinction, the disappearance of personal identity—even as the music itself survived—becomes a telling byproduct. What can be stated with confidence, however, is that Stepanova’s viola works are of high quality and merit performance, study, and wider dissemination. They offer meaningful pedagogical contributions, exploit the expressive and technical potential of the viola with sensitivity, and, as Rupp argues, “are representative of the best of the Socialist Realist style.” 32

Stepanov’s motivation for writing for the viola remains unclear. There is no evidence of a dedicatee, commission, or personal association with the instrument. One may therefore speculate about the intimate, human-voice agency of the viola, which might represent the most honest, private, inner voice of the composer. 27 From this perspective, Three Miniatures may be understood as a distant reflection on Stepanov’s own childhood in the years preceding the Bolshevik Revolution—written, paradoxically, in the same year he was honored with the Stalin Prize for his contribution to Soviet art. The suite thus offers a glimpse into individual memory and longing, carefully contained within an acceptable , standardized aesthetic framework that aligns outwardly with socialist realist norms while quietly sheltering personal affect beneath its surface. A similar expressive strategy can be observed in Stepanov’s other viola works, such as the sorrowful Waltz in F-sharp minor or the Vocalise , in which the viola again appears to articulate emotions that subtly exceed the expected boundaries of socialist realism. Ms. Stepanova If Stepanov represents a case of partial historical erasure, the situation surrounding Vera Alexandrovna Stepanova marks a further escalation of the same phenomenon, reaching an extreme point where biographical absence becomes nearly total. Beyond the scores of her two viola compositions— Sonata for viola and piano (1967) and Poem (1950)—virtually no reliable sources exist: encyclopedic, academic, archival, commercial, or unofficial. 28 The lack of documentation is so profound

Journal of the American Viola Society / Vol. 42, No. 1, Spring 2026

41