Handbook for Irrigation of Wine Grapes in South Africa
Figure 2.11
Chapter 2
1 Day
3 Days
10 Days
10
Bare soil
Mulched soil
8
a
a a a a
6
b
b
b b
b b b b bc bc c c
4 E s (mm/d)
b
b
bc
2
c c c c
c
c c c c
c
1
3
Days
0
10
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
Position number
FIGURE 2.11. The E s from a coarse sandy soil in the days following irrigation as measured at five positions across the work row. The mulch consisted of an 8 t/ha wheat straw layer (Myburgh, 1998).
35
T1 - Bare soil T2 - Shallow tillage
30
T3 - 4 t/ha Straw mulch T4 - 8 t/ha Straw mulch T5 - 12 t/ha Straw mulch
25
20
15
11 mm
10
5
Cumulative water loss (mm)
0
0
2
4
6
8 10 12 14 16
Time (days)
FIGURE 2.12. Effect of thickness of wheat straw mulches and tillage on water losses from the 0-20 cm soil layer in a vineyard following irrigation on 26 November 1995. Vertical bars indicate LSD (p ≤ 0.05) and arrow indicates rainfall (Myburgh, 2013). Figure 2.13 losses is by frequent, shallow tillage. The rationale behind this practice is that the layer of loose topsoil initially dries rapidly, and then acts as a mulch. However, there is some controversy regarding the use of shallow tillage to reduce E s losses. In fact, shallow tillage tended to increase evaporation losses, compared to bare, untilled soil in a vineyard near Stellenbosch (Fig. 2.12). Furthermore, it is well documented that frequent tillage will have negative effects on soil structure which may result in poor water infiltration and Another possible way to reduce E s
IRRIGATION OF WINE GRAPES 39
Made with FlippingBook - Online catalogs