ESTRO course Dose Modelling and Verification 2017

59

References II

9. Zhu XR, Gillin MT, Jursinic PA, Lopez F, Grimm DF, and Rownd JJ (2000) Comparison of dosimetric characteristics of Siemens virtual and physical wedges. Med Phys 27, 2267-77. 10. Kragl G, af Wetterstedt S, Knäusl B, Lind M, McCavana P, Knöös T, McClean B, and Georg D (2009) Dosimetric characteristics of 6 and 10 MV unflattened photon beams. Radiother Oncol 93, 141-6. 11. Tacke MB, Nill S, Häring P, and Oelfke U (2008) 6 MV dosimetric characterization of the 160 MLCTM, the new Siemens multileaf collimator. Med Phys 35, 1634-42. 12. Bieda MR, Antolak JA, Hogstrom KR (2001) The effect of scattering foil parameters on electron- beamMonte Carlo calculations. Med Phys 28, 2527-34. 13. Brahme A, Svensson H (1979) Radiation beam characteristics of a 22 MeV microtron. Acta Radiol Oncol Radiat Phys Biol 18, 244-72. 14. van Battum LJ, van der Zee W, Huizenga H (2003) Scattered radiation from applicators in clinical electron beams. Phys Med Biol 48, 2493-507. 15. Deng J, Pawlicki T, Chen Y et al, The MLC tongue-and-groove effect on IMRT dose distributions, Phys Med Biol 46 (2001) 1039-1060. 16. Knöös T and Wittgren L, Which depth dose data should be used for dose planning with wedge filters? Phys Med Biol 36 (1991) 255-267. 17. Olsson M-L, Monte Carlo simulations of the Elekta Sli Plus electron applicator system – A base for a new applicator design to reduce radiation leakage, MSc Thesis, Lund University, 2003.

T Knöös

Warsaw 2017