16 Cervix Carcinoma

Cervix Cancer 361

69. Landoni F, Maneo A, Colombo A, et al. Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Lancet 1997; 350 : 535-41. 70. Lasry S, Cohen-Solal C, Hacene K, et al. Long-term results of radio-surgical treatment of operable carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Bull Cancer (Paris) 1990; 77 : 355-62. 71. Leborgne F, Fowler JF, Leborgne JH, et al. Fractionation in medium dose rate brachytherapy of cancer of the cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1996; 35(5) : 907-14. 72. LENT SOMA scales for all anatomic sites. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995; 31(5) : 1049-91. 73. Logsdon MD, Eifel PJ. FIGO IIIB squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: an analysis of prognostic factors emphasizing the balance between external beam and intracavitary radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999; 43 : 763-75. 74. Lowrey GC, Mendenhall WM, Million. Stage IB or IIA-B carcinoma of the intact uterine cervix treated with irradiation: a multivariate analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1992; 24 : 205-10. 75. Masterson JG. Radical surgery in early carcinoma of the cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1963; 87 : 601-8. 76. Mayr NA, Taoka T, Yuh WT, et al. Method and timing of tumor volume measurement for outcome prediction in cervical cancer using magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002; 52 : 14-22 . 77. Michel G, Gerbaulet A, Lhommé C, et al. Le traitement des épithéliomas invasif du col utérin: expérience de l’Institut Gustave Roussy. Rev Prat 1990; 40 : 26-30. 78. Morice P, Haie-Meder C, Rey A, et al Radiotherapy and radical surgery for treatment of patients with bulky stage IB and II carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2000, 10 : 239-46. 79. Muirhead W, Green LS. Carcinoma of the cervix: Five year results and sequelae of treatment. Am J obstet Gynecol 1968; 101 :744. 80. Newman G. Increased morbidity following the introduction of remote afterloading, with increased dose rate, for cancer of the cervix. Radiother Oncol 1996; 39 : 97-103. 81. Noyes WR, Peters NE, Thomadsen BR, et al. Impact of “optimized” treatment planning for tandem and ring, and tandem and ovoids, using high dose rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995; 31(1) : 79-86. 82. Orton CG, Seyedsadr M, Somnay A. Comparison of high and low dose rate remote afterloading for cervix carncer and the importance of fractionation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1991; 21(6) : 1425-34. 83. Patel FD, Sharma SC, Negi PS, et al. Low dose rate vs high dose rate brachytherapy in the treatment of carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a clinical trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1994; 28 : 335-41. 84. Pavy JJ, Denekamp J, Letschert J et al. EORTC Late Effects Working Group. Late effects toxicity scoring: the SOMA scale. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995; 31(1) : 1043-7. 85. Pearcey RG. Treatment of high-risk cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 1999 ; 341 : 695. 86. Perez CA, Fox S, Lockett MA, et al. Impact of dose in outcome of irradiation alone in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: analysis of two different methods. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1991; 21 : 885-98. 87. Perez CA, Breaux S, Bedwinek JM, et al. Radiation therapy alone in the treatment of carcinoma of the uterine cervix. II. Analysis of complications. Cancer 1984; 54 : 235-46. 88. Perez CA, Grigsby PW, Nene SM, et al. Effect of tumor size on the prognosis of carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with irradiation alone. Cancer 1992; 69 : 2796-806. 89. Perez CA, Grigsby PW, Lockett MA. Radiation morbidity in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: dosimetric and clinical correlation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999; 44 : 855-66. 90. Perez CA, Grigsby PW, Camel HM, et al. Irradiation alone or combined with surgery in stage IB, IIA and IIB carcinoma of the uterine cervix: update of a nonrandomized comparison. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995; 31 : 703-16. 91. Perez CA. Uterine cervix. In: Perez CA, Brady LW (eds.). Principles and practice of radiation oncology . Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997; 1733-834.