APS_October 2018
J ournal of the A merican P omological S ociety
228
however, better yields were achieved by re- moving fruit from late-fruiting cultivars such as ‘Elliott’ (Strik & Buller, 2005). In our tri- als, FB removal in early-fruiting cultivars ‘Star’ and ‘O’Neal’ during the first 2 years after planting (the T0 treatment) caused a re- duction in the cumulative fruit yield in com- parison with early cropping treatments. Annual fruit yield progression showed that the presence of fruit during the first year (as in the T2 and T3 treatments) did not affect
fruit yield in year 2. In fact, both ‘Star’ and ‘O’Neal’ plants undergoing the T2 and T3 treatments produced the most fruit (Figure 3a, 3c). In contrast, fruit load during year 2 strongly affected fruit yield in year 3, with year 3 yields for both cultivars severely re- duced in T2 and T3 plants with high crop load treatments (Figure 3b, 3d). Year 2, T1 crop load seemed to be appropriate for ‘Star’ because relative fruit yields were only slight- ly lower than in year 3 T0 plants (– 8%) (Fig-
Star
b)
a)
1
100
100
T2
T0
T1
75
75
T3
50
50
T1
T3
25
25
T2
0 Relative fruit yield per plant (%) at year 2 1 T0
0 Relative fruit yield per plant (%) at year 3
0
35
70
105
140
0
5
9
14
Fruit number per plant at year 2
Fruit number per plant at year 1
O’Neal
c)
d)
100
100
T0
T2
T3
75
75
T1
T1
50
50
T2
25
25
T3
T0
0 Relative fruit yield per plant (%) at year 3
0 Relative fruti yield per plant (%) at year 2
0
20
40
60
0
8
17
25
Fruit number per plant at year 2
Fruit number per plant at year 1
Figure 3. Relationship between the number of fruits per plant and relative fruit yield the following year for ‘Star’ and ‘O’Neal’ Southern highbush blueberry cultivars subjected to different flower bud (FB) thinning treatments. Treatments included T0, control treatment, 100% FB removal during the first 2 years; T1, 100% and 50% FB removal at year 1 and year 2, respectively; T2, 50% and 0% FB removal at year 1 and year 2, respectively; T3, no FB removal during the first 2 years after planting. Figure 3. Relationship between the number of fruits per plant and relative fruit yield the following year for ‘Star’ and ‘O’Neal’ Southern highbush blueberry cultivars subjected to different flower bud (FB) thinning treatments. Treatments included T0, control treatment, 100% FB removal during the first 2 years; T1, 100% and 50% FB removal at year 1 and year 2, respectively; T2, 50% and 0% FB removal at year 1 and year 2, respectively; T3, no FB removal during the first 2 years after planting.
Made with FlippingBook Online newsletter