APS_October 2018

J ournal of the A merican P omological S ociety

246

FL10 FL11 FL07 FL06 FL05 FL02 FL04

90

92

HPSI50

IFAS19

Cluster 1

48

95

IFAS25

43

71

FL19 FL20

89

IFAS15

HPSI61

15

HPSI33

HPSI44 HPSI47 IFAS10

15

95

HPSI42

90

HPSI34

69

HPSI37

Cluster 2

99

HPSI06

97

HPSI35

IFAS06 IFAS17 IFAS04

99

36

58

64

HPSI16

IFAS03

55

HPSI19

HPSI17

98

IFAS12 IFAS26 IFAS27 IFAS28

97

74

72

FL08 FL09

75

13

HPSI27

HPSI51 HPSI60

95

Cluster 3

78

HPSI53 HPSI55

25

99

IFAS02 FL01 FL03 FL17 FL18

61

82

80

IFAS11 IFAS20

Cluster 4

HPSI32

43

HPSI38

43

IFAS21

IFAS01

85

69

HPSI15

90

IFAS13

HPSI14

27

FL15

Cluster 5

91

IFAS07 IFAS14

99

FL14 FL16 FL13

96

21

40

HPSI20 HPSI26

98

IFAS08 IFAS09 IFAS16 IFAS22 IFAS23 IFAS24 IFAS29

64

98

0.02

Page | 22 Figure 1. Unrooted neighbor joining tree with Nei and Li (1979) genetic distance designations, for ten guava SSR markers. Identity of guava accessions tested are indicated in Table 1.

Association of SSR fingerprints with pulp color. Some dendrogram clusters correlated with flesh pigmentation. Clusters 1 and 3 were virtually entirely white fleshed acces-

sions, except that the highly pigmented ‘Thai Maroon’ (IFAS15), with red peel, flesh, and leaves and ‘Indonesian Red’ (IFAS10) which has dark pink flesh which are included clus-