DLI 1st grade guide

PROGRESS MONITORING AND UTAH LAW What is progress monitoring ? Progress monitoring is “a scientifcally based practice that is used to assess students’ academic performance and evaluate the effectiveness of instruction.” (National Center on Student Progress Monitoring, 2016). Progress monitoring involves frequent measurement of student performance for the purpose of evaluating a student’s growth toward a targeted objective. Progress monitoring is a powerful formative assessment strategy that has been demonstrated to have a high effect size on student achievement, particularly when data are graphed, shared with students, and decision rules are used to determine when an evidence-based intervention is working for that student or when interventions need to be intensifed. Why progress monitor ? Best practice indicates that students who are signifcantly behind in basic foundational skills, such as reading and math, should receive intensifed instruction accompanied by frequent progress monitoring for the purpose of evaluating a student’s growth toward a targeted objective along with adjusting instruction based on the resulting student data. Progress monitoring makes skill improvement visible to teachers and students alike. Being able to see progress is highly motivating to students. A lack of progress should prompt problem-solving and joint responsibility (student, teachers, and where possible, parents) to fnd a solution. Progress monitoring is essential to determine the effectiveness of intensifed interventions (Tier 2 and Tier 3) within a Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) for identifed students. Who is progress monitored ? Based on Utah state law (SB 127), students who perform below or well below benchmark on curriculum-based measures (e.g., Acadience Reading, Acadience Math) must be progress monitored at the frequency noted below. Ideally, students should be progress monitored using a curriculum-based measure. Once students are consistently performing above benchmark levels, progress monitoring is no longer necessary. Students who perform at grade-level (i.e., meeting benchmarks) should not be progress monitored; screening three times per year is suffcient. Who conducts progress monitoring assessments ? Ideally, the teachers primarily responsible for a given student’s intensive intervention should conduct the progress monitoring. This could be a classroom teacher, a special education teacher, or an intervention specialist with the appropriate training; however, trained instructional assistants and specialized staff who instruct students may also progress monitor students. All progress monitoring data should be entered into the Acadience data management system (acadiencelearning.net) on a weekly basis. To best inform problem solving and decision making, these progress monitoring data should be regularly reviewed by the teachers responsible for a student’s learning, the student, and the parents of that student. It is the combination of all these individuals that makes a collaborative intervention team. When to progress monitor ? Each site will need to identify appropriate times during the school day to progress monitor students (e.g., during skills-based instruction, entrance and exit tasks, etc.). Canyons School District 2022.07.21 USBE Recommended Progress Monitoring Frequency CBM Score Support Level Frequency Well Below Benchmark Core Support + Intensive Support Core Support + Strategic Support Every 1 to 2 weeks Every 2 to 4 weeks Below Benchmark At or Above Benchmark ONLY as necessary NOTE: If students score below or well below on MAZE, progress monitoring should only occur monthly. Core Support