Spring 2019 Course Evaluations

Gavis, A

2066-AE DESIGN THINKING

19/SL Intersession

Students Enrolled: 16

Student Responses: 11

68.75%

Legend: 5=Strongly Agree, 4=Agree, 3=Neutral, 2=Disagree, 1=Strongly Disagree Q1. The professor provided a syllabus that clearly described the goals, content, and requirements of the course. 5 4 3 2 1 Total Mean Median SD Responses 6 2 3 0 0 11 4.27 5 0.86 % 54.55% 18.18% 27.27% 0.00% 0.00% Q2. The course materials and/or assigned text(s) helped me understand concepts and ideas related to the course. 5 4 3 2 1 Total Mean Median SD Responses 6 3 1 1 0 11 4.27 5 0.96 % 54.55% 27.27% 9.09% 9.09% 0.00% Q3. The professor presented course material in a clear and organized fashion. 5 4 3 2 1 Total Mean Median SD Responses 7 2 2 0 0 11 4.45 5 0.78 % 63.64% 18.18% 18.18% 0.00% 0.00% Q4. The professor responded effectively to questions. 5 4 3 2 1 Total Mean Median SD Responses 8 1 1 0 0 10 4.70 5 0.64 % 80.00% 10.00% 10.00% 0.00% 0.00% Q5. The professor promoted a respectful learning environment. 5 4 3 2 1 Total Mean Median SD Responses 9 1 0 1 0 11 4.64 5 0.88 % 81.82% 9.09% 0.00% 9.09% 0.00% Q6. The professor promoted useful classroom discussions, as appropriate for the class. 5 4 3 2 1 Total Mean Median SD Responses 8 1 1 0 0 10 4.70 5 0.64 % 80.00% 10.00% 10.00% 0.00% 0.00% Q7. The professor provided opportunities, either in or outside of class, for me to assess or gauge my understanding of the course material. 5 4 3 2 1 Total Mean Median SD Responses 7 3 1 0 0 11 4.55 5 0.66 % 63.64% 27.27% 9.09% 0.00% 0.00% Q8. The professor helped make the course material interesting and/or relevant. 5 4 3 2 1 Total Mean Median SD Responses 7 3 1 0 0 11 4.55 5 0.66 % 63.64% 27.27% 9.09% 0.00% 0.00%