2nd ICAI 2022

International Conference on Automotive Industry 2022

Mladá Boleslav, Czech Republic

by it. From the point of view of civil liability, the autonomous performance of the vehicle challenges both the notions of subjective and objective liability. This is because, to a certain degree, it is outside the sphere of influence of manufacturers and drivers, however, such autonomy (and its inherent risk) is a desired and expected element of such systems. The problem is compounded by the black box of artificial intelligence, the difficulty of explaining whether the internal processes of autonomous vehicles lead them to make the decisions they do. In addition, several other challenges present themselves. Future regulations will have to deal with the technical aspects of the manufacture and use of vehicles, with possible risk containment measures, such as the imposition of mandatory insurance, as well as with the protection of the (increasingly valuable) data obtained. from the use of autonomous vehicles. Finally, it is emphasized the need for standardization, ranging from system component manufacturers, software developers, assemblers, dealers, workshops and even owners must be governed by obligations and responsibilities expressly in legislation, reducing maximum subjectivism about the obligation to indemnify. References [1] Almeida, J. B. (2000). The legal consumer protection. São Paulo: Saraiva. [2] Benjamin, A. H. de V.; et al. (1991). Consumer law manual . São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais. [3] Brazil (1990). Law 8.078 of September 11, 1990. Provides for consumer protection and other provisions. Official Gazette of the Federative Republic of Brazil . [online]. [cit. 2022-04-04]. Available at: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/LEIS/L8078.htm [4] Brazil (2002). Law 10.406 of January 10, 2002. Establishes the Civil Code. Official Gazette of the Federative Republic of Brazil [online]. [cit. 2022-04-04]. Available at: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/LEIS/2002/L10406.htm [5] Gomes, M. K. (2001). Civil liability: damage and consumer protection . Belo Horizonte: Del Rey. [6] Levy, J. (2015). No need to reinvent the wheel: why existing liability law does not need to be preemptively altered to cope with the debut of the driverless car. Journal of Business Entrepreneurship & The Law , v. 9, p. 355. [7] Nevejans, N. (2016). Policy department C: Citizens’ rights and constitutional affairs. Legal affairs. European civil law rules in robotics . Study for the European Parliament. [online]. [cit.2016-06.02]. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa. eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/571379/IPOL_STU(2016)571379_EN.pdf [8] Marins, J. (1993). Company liability for the facto f the product . São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais.

186