Atos - Registration Document 2016

D Corporate Responsibility Information about the report

D.6

Alignment with Global reporting initiative G4 guidelines D.6.1.3

[G4-6], [G4-15], [G4-18], [G4-20], [G4-21], [G4-23], [G4-28], [G4-29], [G4-32], [G4-47] and [G4-48]

review the prioritization of its sustainable issues and its strategic axes. material assessment performed in 2014, which had confirmed the most relevant topics (aligned with G4 aspects) in order to In 2016, Atos consolidated the results from the extensive well as its link with targets set by the Group. importance of each challenge in relation to its significance for Atos business strategy, its relationship to existing regulations as Interviews are yearly conducted in order to evaluate the members of the Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability Program and approved by the Group Executive Committee. Material issues and new strategic axes are validated by the Nevertheless, it helped the Group to focus on more specific This global review in 2016 confirmed that the issues previously identified in Atos sustainability strategic axes were still relevant. subjects and to reprioritize some aspects within this strategy. In this context, Atos decided to redesign its materiality matrix to be restructures the strategic axes into four main focus areas according to these priorities. The materiality matrix presented in D.1.3.2 better emphasizes the prioritization of Atos corporate responsibility challenges and more precise and better connected to its specific activities and challenges than the Global Reporting Initiative-defined aspects. assessment (See section D.1.3.3). Corporate Responsibility follow up. strategy includes a prioritization of topics which is an essential requirement for our performance dashboard and internal project The selection of the corporate responsibility challenges and KPIs is aligned with Atos business strategy and based on a materiality Responsibility Report. It states which subjects have been considered applicable and then included in the report. The The GRI Content Index table can be found in the Corporate required profile information and an overview of the management approach for each indicator category is also provided. Process for defining report content D.6.1.4

are accurate and exhaustive in line with the GRI-G4 requirements. successfully completed the GRI Content Index Service. Atos aims to demonstrate that the extra financial performance disclosures 2016 Corporate Responsibility Integrated report ‘In accordance’ with the GRI G4 Guidelines “Comprehensive” option. Atos has decent work, human rights, society, product responsibility) plus 8 specific Atos Performance indicators. Atos has produced its and six categories (economic, environment, labor practices & Atos has applied the “Guidance on Defining Report Content” following the Principles of Materiality, Stakeholder Inclusiveness, Sustainability Context and Completeness. Atos is committed to transparent and public reporting on sustainability. This report covers the period from January 1, Atos reports on the full general disclosures and a total of 38 Performance Indicators clustered into management disclosures perimeter has changed compared to 2015. Detailed explanations are provided in next paragraphs. 2016 to December 31, 2016 in a comparable period (one year) to the previous 2015 report. In term of scope the geographical Anthelio, the Company recently acquired by Atos, is not taken into account as part of the Corporate Responsibility reporting scope.

D

[G4-17] Aspects Boundaries

within the organization. Outside the organization, these aspects are material for the mentioned stakeholders. overall Atos organization at the exception of the “product responsibility compliance” aspect, which is only material for Bull The following aspects of GRI 4 are material for the Group for the

Atos | Registration Document 2016

105