ENTSOG GRIP CEE 2014-2023 / Main Report
List of Tables
Table 1:
The list of TSOs contributing to the CEE GRIP 2014–2023 . . . . . . . . 14
Table 2:
Summary of transmission projects, including compressor stations, submitted for CEE GRIP 2014–2023, listed by project promoter . . . . . . 17
Table 3:
Summary of LNG projects submitted for CEE GRIP 2014–2023, listed by project promoter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Table 4:
Summary of UGS projects submitted for CEE GRIP 2014–2023, listed by project promoter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Table 5:
Summary of power to gas projects submitted for CEE GRIP 2014–2023, listed by project promoter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Table 6:
Supply situations applied in the CEE GRIP 2014–2023 . . . . . . . . . 25
Table 7:
Explanation of the abbreviations in the Regional N-1 formula . . . . . . . 27
Table 8:
Evolution of the demand by country/balancing zone under the average day conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
Table 9:
Minimum deliveries of gas in [GWh/d] to the EU per source under the market integration assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
Table 10:
Maximum deliveries of gas in [GWh/d] to the EU per source under the market integration assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
Table 11:
Evolution of gas demand [GWh/d] by country/balancing zone under the single day uniform risk scenario . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
Table 12:
Evolution of gas demand [GWh/d] by country/balancing zone under the two-week uniform risk day scenario . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
Table 13:
Results of regional N-1 formula in the winter period in case of the disruption via Ukraine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
Table 14:
Results of regional N-1 formula in the winter period in case of the disruption via Belarus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
Table 15:
Summary of forecasted demand under all scenarios in the CEE region . . . 83
4 |
GRIP Central Eastern Europe 2014–2023
Made with FlippingBook