ENTSOG GRIP CEE 2014-2023 / Main Report

List of Tables

Table 1:

The list of TSOs contributing to the CEE GRIP 2014–2023 . . . . . . . . 14

Table 2:

Summary of transmission projects, including compressor stations, submitted for CEE GRIP 2014–2023, listed by project promoter . . . . . . 17

Table 3:

Summary of LNG projects submitted for CEE GRIP 2014–2023, listed by project promoter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

Table 4:

Summary of UGS projects submitted for CEE GRIP 2014–2023, listed by project promoter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

Table 5:

Summary of power to gas projects submitted for CEE GRIP 2014–2023, listed by project promoter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

Table 6:

Supply situations applied in the CEE GRIP 2014–2023 . . . . . . . . . 25

Table 7:

Explanation of the abbreviations in the Regional N-1 formula . . . . . . . 27

Table 8:

Evolution of the demand by country/balancing zone under the average day conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31

Table 9:

Minimum deliveries of gas in [GWh/d] to the EU per source under the market integration assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41

Table 10:

Maximum deliveries of gas in [GWh/d] to the EU per source under the market integration assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42

Table 11:

Evolution of gas demand [GWh/d] by country/balancing zone under the single day uniform risk scenario . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52

Table 12:

Evolution of gas demand [GWh/d] by country/balancing zone under the two-week uniform risk day scenario . . . . . . . . . . . . 59

Table 13:

Results of regional N-1 formula in the winter period in case of the disruption via Ukraine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76

Table 14:

Results of regional N-1 formula in the winter period in case of the disruption via Belarus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77

Table 15:

Summary of forecasted demand under all scenarios in the CEE region . . . 83

4 |

GRIP Central Eastern Europe 2014–2023

Made with