ENTSOG GRIP CEE 2014-2023 / Main Report
Figure 21:
The share of supply sources in the CEE region under minimum deliveries of gas from Russia and the average day conditions . . . . . . . 43
Figure 22:
The share of supply sources in the CEE region under minimum deliveries of LNG and under the average day conditions . . . . . . . . . 43
Figure 23:
The share of supply sources in the CEE region under maximum deliveries of gas from Russia and under the average day conditions . . . . 44
Figure 24:
The share of supply sources in the CEE region under maximum deliveries of LNG and the average day conditions . . . . . . . . . . . 45
Figure 25:
Source predominance in the CEE region under reference scenario and min/max RU, min/max LNG cases in the 2014 FID case . . . . . . . 46
Figure 26:
Source predominance in the CEE region under reference scenario and min/max RU, min/max LNG cases in the 2018 FID case . . . . . . . 46
Figure 27:
Source predominance in the CEE region under reference scenario and min/max RU, min/max LNG cases in the 2023 FID case . . . . . . . 47
Figure 28:
Source predominance in the CEE region under reference scenario and min/max RU, min/max LNG cases in the 2018 non-FID case . . . . . 47
Figure 29:
Source predominance in the CEE region under reference scenario and min/max RU, min/max LNG cases in the 2023 non-FID case . . . . . 47
Figure 30:
The share of supply sources in the CEE region under maximum deliveries of gas from Norway and the average day conditions . . . . . . 48
Figure 31:
The share of supply sources in the CEE region under maximum deliveries of gas from Algeria and under the average day conditions . . . . 48
Figure 32:
The share of supply sources in the CEE region maximum deliveries of gas from Libya and the average day conditions . . . . . . . 48
Figure 33:
Source predominance in the CEE region under reference scenario and max NO, DZ, LY cases in the 2014 FID case . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Figure 34:
Source predominance in the CEE region under reference scenario and max NO, DZ, LY cases in the 2018 FID case . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Figure 35:
Source predominance in the CEE region under reference scenario and max NO, DZ, LY cases in the 2023 FID case . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Figure 36:
Source predominance in the CEE region under reference scenario and max NO, DZ, LY cases in the 2018 non-FID case . . . . . . . . . 51
Figure 37:
Source predominance in the CEE region under reference scenario and max NO, DZ, LY cases in the 2023 non-FID case . . . . . . . . . 51
Figure 38:
Infrastructure remaining flexibility by country/balancing zone under the disruption via Ukraine and the single day uniform risk conditions . . . . 53
Figure 39:
The share of supply sources in the CEE region under the disruption via Ukraine and the single day uniform risk conditions . . . . . . . . . 53
Figure 40:
Remaining flexibility by country under under the disruption via Ukraine and the single day uniform risk conditions . . . . . . . . . 54
Figure 41:
Infrastructure remaining flexibility by country/balancing zone under the disruption via Belarus and the single day uniform risk conditions . . . . 55
6 |
GRIP Central Eastern Europe 2014–2023
Made with FlippingBook