ENTSOG GRIP CEE 2014-2023 / Main Report

Figure 21:

The share of supply sources in the CEE region under minimum deliveries of gas from Russia and the average day conditions . . . . . . . 43

Figure 22:

The share of supply sources in the CEE region under minimum deliveries of LNG and under the average day conditions . . . . . . . . . 43

Figure 23:

The share of supply sources in the CEE region under maximum deliveries of gas from Russia and under the average day conditions . . . . 44

Figure 24:

The share of supply sources in the CEE region under maximum deliveries of LNG and the average day conditions . . . . . . . . . . . 45

Figure 25:

Source predominance in the CEE region under reference scenario and min/max RU, min/max LNG cases in the 2014 FID case . . . . . . . 46

Figure 26:

Source predominance in the CEE region under reference scenario and min/max RU, min/max LNG cases in the 2018 FID case . . . . . . . 46

Figure 27:

Source predominance in the CEE region under reference scenario and min/max RU, min/max LNG cases in the 2023 FID case . . . . . . . 47

Figure 28:

Source predominance in the CEE region under reference scenario and min/max RU, min/max LNG cases in the 2018 non-FID case . . . . . 47

Figure 29:

Source predominance in the CEE region under reference scenario and min/max RU, min/max LNG cases in the 2023 non-FID case . . . . . 47

Figure 30:

The share of supply sources in the CEE region under maximum deliveries of gas from Norway and the average day conditions . . . . . . 48

Figure 31:

The share of supply sources in the CEE region under maximum deliveries of gas from Algeria and under the average day conditions . . . . 48

Figure 32:

The share of supply sources in the CEE region maximum deliveries of gas from Libya and the average day conditions . . . . . . . 48

Figure 33:

Source predominance in the CEE region under reference scenario and max NO, DZ, LY cases in the 2014 FID case . . . . . . . . . . . 50

Figure 34:

Source predominance in the CEE region under reference scenario and max NO, DZ, LY cases in the 2018 FID case . . . . . . . . . . . 50

Figure 35:

Source predominance in the CEE region under reference scenario and max NO, DZ, LY cases in the 2023 FID case . . . . . . . . . . . 50

Figure 36:

Source predominance in the CEE region under reference scenario and max NO, DZ, LY cases in the 2018 non-FID case . . . . . . . . . 51

Figure 37:

Source predominance in the CEE region under reference scenario and max NO, DZ, LY cases in the 2023 non-FID case . . . . . . . . . 51

Figure 38:

Infrastructure remaining flexibility by country/balancing zone under the disruption via Ukraine and the single day uniform risk conditions . . . . 53

Figure 39:

The share of supply sources in the CEE region under the disruption via Ukraine and the single day uniform risk conditions . . . . . . . . . 53

Figure 40:

Remaining flexibility by country under under the disruption via Ukraine and the single day uniform risk conditions . . . . . . . . . 54

Figure 41:

Infrastructure remaining flexibility by country/balancing zone under the disruption via Belarus and the single day uniform risk conditions . . . . 55

6 |

GRIP Central Eastern Europe 2014–2023