Stakeholder Panel Composition
•
Product Manufacturers
•
Analyte/Method Subject Matter
Experts
•
Technology Providers
•
Reference Materials Developers
•
Ingredient Manufacturers
•
Method End Users
•
Academia
•
Method Developers
•
Government and Regulatory Agencies
•
Contract Research Organizations
•
Non‐Governmental Organizations (ISO,
IDF, etc…)
•
Other…. as identified
Anyone with a material interest can participate
Balanced group of voting stakeholders
Chair and voting members vetted
Advisory Panel
Stakeholder
Panel
Publication of
Standard
Method
Performance
Requirements
Working
Groups
Expert Review
Panel
First Action,
OfficialMethods
status
After 2 years,
ERP
recommends to
AOACOfficial
Methods Board
regarding status
ofmethod
Working Groups
Community Subgroup
d ll
d
Stakeholder Working
Group
•
Engage in the detailed discussions
•
Discuss an ra y aroun
subtopics of the community
•
May make recommendation
and participate in larger
community meeting
•
Based on interest
•
Balance of perspectives not
and work of the stakeholders
•
Develop draft fitness for purpose
and standard method performance
requirements (SMPRs)or other
draft standard as proposed by
stakeholder panel
•
Recommend draft standards to the
stakeholder panel
•
Can review and recommend
methods for consideration
considered
•
Usually not funded
•
Not managed by staff
•
Formed based on efficiency for
work
•
Managed by staff
•
Conducted in accordance with
national and international
standards development criteria
