Central Eastern Europe GRIP 2017 |
33
EXISTING
INFRASTRUCTURE
LOW
Minimum development of
infrastructure common to
all levels
ADVANCED
2nd PCI LIST
Assessment as a whole of the projects
belonging to each Infrastructure Level
HIGH
FID PROJECTS
FID PROJECTS
FID PROJECTS
FID PROJECTS
EXISTING
INFRASTRUCTURE
EXISTING
INFRASTRUCTURE
EXISTING
INFRASTRUCTURE
ADVANCED
NON-FID
PROJECTS
LESS-ADVANCED
NON-FID
PROJECTS
ADVANCED
NON-FID
PROJECTS
2nd PCI LIST
NON-FID
PROJECTS
Assessment of the
Infrastructure
needs
Figure 3.1:
Infrastructure Levels (Source: TYNDP 2017)
All assessment results prepared for the CEE GRIP can be found in the CEE GRIP
Annex B - Modelling Results. The following figure describes the differences between
the infrastructure levels.
According to the TYNDP 2017 methodology, the Remaining Flexibility (RF) indicator
measures the resilience of a zone (at the country level). The indicator is calculated
for high demand situations as the additional share of demand each country is able
to cover before an infrastructure or supply limitation is reached. This calculation is
made independently for each country, meaning that they do not share European
supply flexibility. The higher the indicator value is, the better the resilience. In cas-
es where countries experience disrupted demand, the Remaining Flexibility is equal
to zero.
The Disrupted Rate (DR) represents the share of the gas demand that cannot be
satisfied. It is calculated as a daily volume. The level of disruption is assessed
assuming cooperative behaviour between European countries in order to mitigate its
relative impact. This means that countries try to reduce the Disrupted Rate of other
countries by sharing the load. Non-alignment of the Disrupted Rate between
countries indicates an infrastructure bottleneck. The distribution of Disrupted Rate
among countries is therefore a strong indication of infrastructure needs.
In this chapter, you will find a presentation of assessment results for the CEE region
for the Peak Day of the Blue Transition and the Green Evolution demand scenarios
for the LOW, 2
nd
PCI, and HIGH infrastructure levels with and without a simultane-
ous disruption of the gas supply routes via Ukraine and Belarus and a disruption of
the Russian gas supply source. Comprehensive results for all modelled specific
disruption cases for CEE GRIP can be found in CEE GRIP Annex B – Modelling
Results. The results are presented for the years 2017, 2020 and 2025.