Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  884-885 / 1195 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 884-885 / 1195 Next Page
Page Background

Table 2. Comparison of presumptive positives using the LMX method and confirmed positive

Listeria monocytogenes

inoculated

232

samples in various food matrices at low level of inoculation (0.2-2 CFU/test portion). No false-positives were detected.

233

Matrix

Strain

MPN

a

/ 25 g

N

b

Presumptive

Confirmed

dPOD

C

f

95% CI

g

X

c

POD

C

d

95% CI

x

POD

C

e

95% CI

Ground Beef

L. monocyto

-genes

ATCC 13932

0.945

25

7

0.28

0.14-0.48

7

0.28

0.14-0.48

0

-0.24--0.24

95% CI 0.43-1.54

Queso Fresco

L. monocyto

-genes

ATCC 19114

0.794

95% CI 0.47-1.31

25

11

0.44

0.27-0.63

11

0.44

0.27-0.63

0

-0.26-0.26

Deli Ham

L. monocyto

-genes

ATCC 7644

1.31

95% CI 0.79-2.55

25

16

0.64

0.45-0.80

16

0.64

0.45-0.80

0

-0.25-0.25

Deli Turkey

L. monocyto

-genes

ATCC 7644

1.31

95% CI 0.79-2.55

25

16

0.64

0.45-0.80

16

0.64

0.45-0.80

0

-0.25-0.25

a

MPN = Most Probable Number is based on the POD of reference method test portions across labs using the AOAC MPN calculator, with 95% confidence interval

234

b

N = Number of test potions

235

c

x = Number of positive test portions

236

d

POD

C

=

Confirmed candidate method positive outcomes divided by the total number of trials

237

e

POD

R

= Confirmed reference method positive outcomes divided by the total number of trials

238

f

dPOD

C

= Difference between the presumptive positives and confirmed positive POD values

239

g

95% CI = If the confidence interval of a dPOD does not contain zero, then the difference is statistically significant at the 5% level

240

PTM Certification Modification Report