Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  58 / 88 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 58 / 88 Next Page
Page Background

58

introduction of harvest-forecasting methodologies

for different crops and climatic/altitude zones and

particular communities with regard to climate change

risks. In terms of financial planning, the document

considers climate change and its impact on Armenia’s

natural and climatic conditions.

Azerbaijan

The State Programme on the Reliable Food Supply

of Population in the Azerbaijan Republic states that

the combination of the increase in oil prices, the

negative trends in the financial markets, as well as the

rise in the demand for food products as a result of

population increases, climate change, limited water

reserves have contributed to increases in global food

prices. As a result, food insecurity has risen in some

countries (President of Azerbaijan 2008b). It proposes

the implementation of the following actions:

• Development and cultivation of agricultural plant

varieties which are more resistant to the effects of

drought, frost, diseases and pests

• Improvement of farming methods and

technologies

• Improvement of irrigation methods and water use

efficiencies

• Reduction and elimination of the use of dangerous

pesticides and fertilisers.

Moreover, it proposes activities aimed at improving the

efficient use of water irrigation and prevention of soil

degradation to mitigate the effect of climate change.

The programme also underlines that up to 40 per cent

(3.4 million hectares) of the land in mountainous

areas had been subject to erosion of various degrees

and therefore envisages land-reclamation activities in

657 thousand hectares of the irrigated land.

Considering recent climate change assessments

and the commitment to address climate risks in

the programme for 2008–2015 and other policy

documents in Azerbaijan, the assumption is that

the new programme or strategy will reflect climate

change challenges in more detail.

Georgia

The Agriculture Development Strategy of Georgia

(MoA 2015) is divided into strategic directions and

measures. In the Strategic Direction: Climate Change,

Environment and Biodiversity, the document envisages:

• Creation of a gene bank for the conservation of

agro-diversity and endemic species and thus

increasing agricultural sector resilience to climate

change especially in arid and semi-arid zones, and

in general

• Promotion of climate smart agriculture (CSA)

practice in agricultural production to ensure

economic and social welfare of farmers and other

types of vulnerable groups.

It states: “it is important to promote a Climate Smart

Agriculture approach that simultaneously addresses

three intertwined challenges: ensuring food security

through increased productivity and income, adapting

to climate change and contributing to mitigation

of climate change”. This measure promotes strong

coordination of action among different stakeholders,

including government institutions, local authorities,

NGOs and private sector representatives, to develop

relevant national and municipal programmes. As

well as development of capacities, introduction of

relevant technologies, it envisages research to ensure

increased agricultural production resilience to

climate change impacts. Moreover, climate change is

mainstreamed under other strategic directions and

measures such as the reduction of soil degradation

and desertification processes.

According to the strategy to define and support rural

development and investment strategies for each

region, the Ministry of Agriculture shall collaborate

with other entities and local authorities to draft a rural

development policy, which, in turn, shall be based on

local, social, economic and cultural specifications. A

unified action plan shall be developed incorporating

short, medium and long-term measures. Special

attention shall be given to high mountain regions.

Energy

Energy segment development and regulation in

all three countries incorporate laws and strategies

on conventional and alternative/renewable energy

sectors. Some of them recognise climate change as a

phenomenon and promote action to mitigate climate

change but none of them consider the reverse effect of

climate change on renewable energy sources and/or on

physical infrastructure or potential heating or cooling

demand through climate change. The energy sector

resilience in the South Caucasus countries is an under-

researched issue and even National Communications

to the UNFCCC do not cover this sufficiently.

Armenia’s INDC (MoNP 2015) underlines energy

sector vulnerability, both for hydro- and thermal

power plants, to climate change throughmodification

of hydrology regimes or glacier melting. A number

of other studies and documents cover similar issues.

However, as it is assumed that over a fifty-year

perspective (the average lifespan of hydropower

plants), no significant changes to river hydrology

regimes are expected, policy makers in the energy

sector do not consider adaptation as a priority issue.

Therefore, no adaptation actions have been planned

or implemented in this area so far.

Tourism

Among the three countries of the South Caucasus

only Armenia has a policy related to the potential

impact of climate change on the tourism sector.