Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  63 / 88 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 63 / 88 Next Page
Page Background

63

The National Programme on the restoration and

expansion of forests in the Azerbaijani Republic

(2003–2008), among others, considered forest

restoration as part of broader climate change

impacts which “increase the rate of pests and

diseases, and reduce fertility and quality of seeds”

(MoENR 2003).

According to the ENPI FLEG programme,

since the approval of the “National Programme

on restoration and expansion of forests in the

Azerbaijani Republic” anumber of forest restoration

actions have been carried out on more than 71,634

hectares of forest land, and a large number of trees

were planted (ENPI FLEG 2015).

Azerbaijan

CASE STUDY

under the limited budgets of municipalities. Local

authorities consider urgent social or economic needs as

higher priorities (e.g. social assistance, infrastructural

projects, rehabilitation of schools, hospitals and roads,

etc.) than climate change strategies, programmes and

plans (including ones for mountain regions). This

prevents local authorities from formal adoption and

further implementation actions.

This situation has been improved by recent

awareness-raising campaigns, but the problem is

still acute. Public awareness can significantly change

existing practice and create incentives for approval

of local climate actions, even with existing limited

budgets. This is true for Georgia, where, in a number

of municipalities, adaptation related infrastructure

projects, such as construction of dams or measures

aimed at protecting against sea storms or river

flooding, are implemented and financed or co-

financed through local budgets.

However, within an existing institutional context

characterised by limited municipal budgets and

a lack of public awareness, regional/municipal/

local climate action plans and guiding documents

developed by different non-governmental actors

remain ineffective and non-feasible tools from an

implementational viewpoint.

Another option for implementation of climate

strategies is donor funding. A common approach for

donor-funded elaboration of local/municipal action

sees “visibility” being combined with “feasibility”.

In addition to a research and planning component,

donor-supported projects, usually incorporate pilot

activities, which can be considered as an initial

implementation of the action plans/strategies or, in

other words, “seed money”.

It is noteworthy, that in the planning of climate

change projects, non-governmental and international

organizations often refer to the National

Communications to the UNFCCC or policy documents.

There is also variety in the status of strategies

which are approved by national governments (see

Azerbaijan case study). Such strategies and action

plans or programmes usually have monitoring

and financial mechanisms, as well as responsible

government agencies, which are supposed to ensure

the progress of their implementation.

Hirkan national park, Lankaran, Azerbaijan