221 / 272
TAR NC Implementation Document – Second Edition September 2017 |
221
Application – by each TSO – of the tariffs derived for the joint entity makes it possi-
ble to obtain results for postage stamp and CWD in terms of revenues. Note that the
value of the ITC is still not determined at this stage.
OBTAINED REVENUES
Postage Stamp
CWD
Postage Stamp
CWD
TSO A
Entry A2
9.64m€
6.05m€
TSO B
Entry B1
57.86m€
61.4m€
Exit Dom A3
48.21m€
51.01m€
Exit Dom B2
14.46m€
10.0m€
Exit A4
4.82m€
6.52m€
Sum
72m€
71m€
Sum
62.68m€
63.59m€
ITC
– 7.32m€
– 6.41m€
ITC
7.32m€
6.41m€
Revenues after ITC
65m€
65m€
Revenues after ITC
70m€
70m€
Table 49:
Revenue table after the merger (joint case)
The ITC value is derived by difference between the allowed revenue of each TSO and
the revenue collected via the tariffs derived for the joint entity.
The model indicates
that an ITC of 7.32M€ must be collected by TSO B
through its tariffs, and passed
on to TSO A.
Compared to the pre-merged situation, the revenue reallocation after the removal of
points A1 and B3 is performed via a tariff increase at all points in the postage stamp
case, but via a mixed evolution of tariffs depending on the points in the CWD case.
This is the same conclusion as the one to be displayed next in the separate case.
REVENUE SHORTFALL OF POINTS A1 AND B3 HAS TO BE COVERED AT
OTHER POINTS
Revenue to recover – m€
Revenue to recover – %
Post Stamp
CWD Post Stamp
CWD
TSO A
Revenue A1
29m€
28m€
41%
40%
TSO B
Revenue B3
24m€
25m€
38%
39%
Table 50:
Revenue reallocation after the merger (joint case)