222 / 272
222 |
TAR NC Implementation Document – Second Edition September 2017
PART III SAME RPM APPLIED SEPARATELY BY THE
TWO TSOs IN THE SAME ENTRY-EXIT SYSTEM
As an alternative to the default approach of joint application in a merged entry-exit
system, TSOs may apply separately the same RPM.
The maps used for the joint application in the same entry-exit system are also used
here.
The following table represents the remaining points and their technical and
forecasted booking capacities, in parallel with the same allowed revenue to recover
for each TSO. As a reminder, the removal of points A1 and B3 has changed the
entry-exit split based on the forecasted bookings for both TSOs: it is now 15/85 for
TSO A and 80/20 for TSO B.
INPUT DATA
Technical cap. – GWh/h Forecast – GWh/h Entry/Exit Split: Entry Entry/Exit Split: Exit
Revenue before
ITC payment
TSO A
Entry A2
4
2
15%
85%
60,00m€
Exit Dom A3
11
10
Exit A4
3
1
TSO B
Entry B1
13
12
80%
20%
75,00m€
Exit Dom B2
3
3
inter-TSO compensation (A -> B)
–10m€
Due to NRA decision/calculation. In example, ITC value is chosen by an NRA decision (ex ante).
Table 51:
Input data after the merger (separate case)
In the above table, one assumes that the NRA in charge of the merged entry-exit
system decides that an
ITC of 10M€
will be set up from TSO B to TSO A to ensure
the revenue reallocation. The NRA decides that TSO B will charge tariffs at its
remaining points in one revenue pot but for 2 purposes:
1) collecting its own allowed revenue (the same as in Part I), and
2) collecting the ITC.
Meanwhile, TSO A will charge tariffs at its remaining points for the sole purpose of
collecting its own allowed revenue whose value is diminished by the predefined
value of the ITC, in comparison to Part I. Therefore, TSO A will collect 60M€ (instead
of 70M€ before the merger) and TSO B will collect 75M€ (instead of 65M€).