![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0224.jpg)
224 |
TAR NC Implementation Document – Second Edition September 2017
Then the same type of calculations as those used in the pre-merged case are
necessary to derive tariffs, and the results appear in the next figure.
Capacity Weighted Distance Approach (separate application)
TSO A
TSO B
Allowed Revenues
60.00m€
75.00m€
E/E-Split
Entry
50%
Entry
50%
Exit
50%
Exit
50%
Revenues
Entry
30.00m€
Entry
37.50m€
Exit
30.00m€
Exit
37.50m€
Fcap – Proportions
Entry A2
100%
Entry B1
100%
Exit Dom A3
91%
Exit Dom B2
100%
Exit A4
9%
Calculation of capacity-weighted average distance
Entry A2
450
Entry B1
550
Exit Dom A3
450
Exit Dom B2
550
Exit A4
450
Calculation of the weight of each point
Entry A2
100%
Entry B1
100%
Exit Dom A3
91%
Exit Dom B2
100%
Exit A4
9%
Allocation of costs
Entry A2
30.00m€
Entry B1
37.50m€
Exit Dom A3
27.27m€
Exit Dom B2
37.50m€
Exit A4
2.73m€
Determination of tariffs – €/kWh/h
Entry A2
15.00
Entry B1
3.13
Exit Dom A3
2.73
Exit Dom B2
12.50
Exit A4
2.73
Table 54:
CWD tariff derivation
Then, the tariffs make it possible to obtain results for postage stamp and CWD in
terms of revenues in the separate case, with the assumption of an ITC of 10M€
collected by TSO B.