Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  224 / 272 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 224 / 272 Next Page
Page Background

224 |

TAR NC Implementation Document – Second Edition September 2017

Then the same type of calculations as those used in the pre-merged case are

necessary to derive tariffs, and the results appear in the next figure.

Capacity Weighted Distance Approach (separate application)

TSO A

TSO B

Allowed Revenues

60.00m€

75.00m€

E/E-Split

Entry

50%

Entry

50%

Exit

50%

Exit

50%

Revenues

Entry

30.00m€

Entry

37.50m€

Exit

30.00m€

Exit

37.50m€

Fcap – Proportions

Entry A2

100%

Entry B1

100%

Exit Dom A3

91%

Exit Dom B2

100%

Exit A4

9%

Calculation of capacity-weighted average distance

Entry A2

450

Entry B1

550

Exit Dom A3

450

Exit Dom B2

550

Exit A4

450

Calculation of the weight of each point

Entry A2

100%

Entry B1

100%

Exit Dom A3

91%

Exit Dom B2

100%

Exit A4

9%

Allocation of costs

Entry A2

30.00m€

Entry B1

37.50m€

Exit Dom A3

27.27m€

Exit Dom B2

37.50m€

Exit A4

2.73m€

Determination of tariffs – €/kWh/h

Entry A2

15.00

Entry B1

3.13

Exit Dom A3

2.73 

Exit Dom B2

12.50

Exit A4

2.73 

Table 54:

CWD tariff derivation

Then, the tariffs make it possible to obtain results for postage stamp and CWD in

terms of revenues in the separate case, with the assumption of an ITC of 10M€

collected by TSO B.