RM Winter 2017

References

Meneses, J., Fabregues, S., Rodriguez-Gomez, D., & Ion, G. (2012). Internet in teachers’professional practice outside the classroom: Examining supportive and management uses in primary and secondary schools. Computers & Education, 59 (3), 915-924.

(2002). No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110. Retrieved from: http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/107-110.pdf.

Becker, H. (2000). How exemplary computer-using teachers differ from other teachers: implications for realizing the potential of computers in schools. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 1 (2), 274–293. Connors, S. P. (2012). Toward a shared vocabulary for visual analysis: An analytical toolkit for deconstructing the visual design of graphic novels. Journal of Visual Literacy, 31, 71-92.

Magner, T. J. (2011). The time is now for 21st-century teaching. Education Week , 31(5), 24.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108 , 1017-1054.

Reading Matters Research Matters

National Council of Teachers of English. (2005). Position statement on multimodal literacy. Retrieved from http://www.ncte.org/positions/statements/ multimodalliteracies National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Offices (2012). Common Core State Standards . National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Offices: Washington, D.C. National Writing Project with DeVoss, N., Eidman-Aadahl, E., & Hicks, T. (2010). Because digital writing matters. Improving student writing in online and multimedia environments. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Dewey, J. (1998/ 1933). How we think: a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

Donnelly, D., McGarr, O., & O-Reilly, J. (2011). A framework for teachers’integration of ICT into their classroom practice. Computers & Education, 57, 1469-1483.

Ertmer, P., & Leftwich-Ottenbreit. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Technology Research in Education , 42 , 255–284. Gambrell, L. B., Hughes, E. M., Calvert, W. L., Malloy, J. A., & Igo, B. (2011). The role of authentic tasks in elementary students’literacy. The Elementary School Journal, 112 (2), 234-258.

New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66 , 60-92.

Graham, C. R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 57, 1953-1960.

Palak, D., &Walls, R. (2009). Teachers’beliefs and technology practices: A mixed- methods approach. Journal of Technology Research in Education , 41 , 417-441.

Hogarty, K. Y., Lang, T. R., & Kromrey, J. D. (2003). Another look at technology use in classrooms: The development and validation of an instrument to measure teachers’perceptions. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 63, 139–162. Honeyford, M.A. (2014). From Aquí and Allá : Symbolic convergence in the multimodal literacy practices of adolescent immigrant students. Journal of Literacy Research, 46, 194-233. International Society for Technology in Education. (2007). ISTE’s national educational technology standards for students (NETS-S). Retrieved from http:// www.iste.org/Libraries/PDFs/NETS-S_Standards.sflb.ashx International Society for Technology in Education. (2008). ISTE’s national educational technology standards for teachers (NETS-T). Retrieved from http:// www.iste.org/Libraries/PDFs/NETS-T_Standards.sflb.ashx

Prensky, M. (2005/2006). Listen to the natives. Educational Leadership , 63(4), 8-13.

Prestridge, S. (2012). The beliefs behind the teacher that influences their ICT practices. Computers & Education, 58, 449-458.

Rance-Roney, J. (2010). Jump-starting language and schema for English-language learners: Teacher-composed digital jumpstarts for academic reading. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53 , 386-395.

Reinking, D., & Bradley, B. A. (2007). On formative and design experiments: Approaches to language and literacy research . New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Reinking, D., & Pickle, J. M. (1993). Using a formative experiment to study how computers affect reading and writing in classrooms. In C. Kinzer & D.J. Leu (Eds.), Examining central issues in literacy research, theory, and practice . Chicago: National Reading Conference. Reinking, D., &Watkins, J. (1998). Balancing change and understanding in literacy research through formative experiments. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 47 , 461-471. Reinking, D., &Watkins, J. (2000). A formative experiment investigating the use of multimedia book reviews to increase elementary students’independent reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 35 , 384-419.

International Society for Technology in Education. (2008). ISTE’s standards for students.. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/my-profile/standards-download

Jiménez, R. T. (1997). The strategic reading abilities and potential of five low- literacy Latina/o readers in middle school. Reading Research Quarterly, 32 (3), 224-243.

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9 (1), 60-70.

Robin, B. (2008).“The Educational Uses of Digital Storytelling”Retrieved from http://faculty.coe.uh.edu/brobin/homepage/Educational-Uses-DS.pdf

Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New Literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.

| 28 | Reading Matters | Volume 16 • Winter 2016 | scira.org

CLICK HERE TO RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS