Cap Gemini - Registration Document 2016

3

CAPGEMINI: PEOPLE, CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) AND BUSINESS ETHICS

3.3 Managing our environmental impact

Managing climate risk 3.3.3

Group for the first time, to complement those already in place in remain focused on reducing our greenhouse gas emissions and in 2016 we set environmental targets for the whole Capgemini Capgemini recognizes the importance of climate change and our responsibility as a business to mitigate our own impacts. We our larger entities. only a future inevitability but are already being experienced. As well as minimizing our own contribution to climate change and Climate change impacts and global temperature increases are not working with clients to enable carbon reductions, we need to ensure we have the capability to adapt to climate change. This We have a number of mechanisms in place to identify, control and manage climate-related risks, including: means, for example, ensuring business continuity and supporting the wellbeing of our people in the face of extreme weather events. Register”, which is reviewed annually. This identifies key environmental “aspects” (such as energy use or flooding), all ISO 14001 certified entities have an “Aspects and Impacts 1. what “impacts” these have (or could have) legally and commercially for Capgemini, the risks associated with each

India, with a focus on key assets and operations, supply chain the key risks and opportunities for Capgemini in the UK and risk and on the impacts within key sectors (such as retail and the public sector) which Capgemini serves; the completion of a materiality assessment (refer to 3. section 3.1.3) also highlighted the importance of climate change mitigation, energy security and the continued need for Capgemini to reduce its GHG emissions to our stakeholders. To build further on this, we are currently in the early stages of developing a Group-wide approach which will further integrate climate change risk into our corporate risk management. The focus will be on evaluating climate change hazards (such as shortages) and assessing our capacity to adapt to these. The evaluation will assess the vulnerability to climate change of our extreme weather events, changing weather patterns and water clients and our industry and considering how our services can support these. assets, client workplace locations, suppliers and clients. We will also be identifying new climate-related opportunities from our in the CDP Climate Change disclosure , placing us in the top 23% Our commitment to managing our climate risk effectively continues to be recognized externally, this year with a score of A- of companies in our sector.

and key mitigation steps taken;

complete a Climate Change Risk Assessment. This looked at in 2014, we commissioned NGO Forum for the Future to 2.

Our environmental performance 3.3.4 Overall emissions In 2015, Capgemini’s total GHG emissions for the entire Group were 527,529 tCO 2 e. Comparison with the 2015 restated data shows that total emissions have decreased very slightly by 0.5%, in spite of a significant 4.4% increase in average headcount during 2016. As a result we have already made progress against our

energy-related emissions per head of 6.6% and a reduction of our travel emissions per head of 3.2%. e per head to 2.84 tons of CO 2 e per head (1) . Primarily this has been driven by a reduction in our headline Group target, with a 4.7% reduction in emissions per head in 2016 (from 2.98 tons CO 2

Emissions per head by region

6

-2%

-11%

-4%

5

4

-6%

-5%

3

-6%

+8%

2

-4%

+9%

-8%

1

0

North America

France

United Kingdom & Ireland

Southern Europe

Asia-Pacific & Latin America

Benelux

India

Germany & Central Europe

Total

Nordic countries

2015

2016

sections of this report. using the December 2015 head count as compared to the December 2016 headcount. As a consequence, the headcount stats here may vary slightly from the absolute figures quoted in other For the purposes of measuring GHG emissions per head, an average headcount over the year has been calculated for both 2015 and 2016, which represents a more accurate calculation than (1)

136

Registration Document 2016 — Capgemini