Labor Relations: The Meet and Confer Process

85 Placentia Fire Fighters v. City of Placentia (1976) 57 Cal.App.3d 9, 22-23 [129 Cal.Rptr. 126, 135]. 86 Public Employees Assn. v. Board of Supervisors (1985) 167 Cal.App.3d 797, 804–805 [213 Cal.Rptr. 491, 495]. 87 County of Solano (2014) PERB Dec. No. 2402-M [39 PERC ¶ 78]. 88 Alameda County Employees' Assn. v. County of Alameda (1973) 30 Cal.App.3d 518 [106 Cal.Rptr. 441]. 89 Davis City Employees Association (2012) PERB Decision No. 2271-M [37 PERC ¶ 12]. 90 Procter & Gamble Mfg. Co. (1966) 160 NLRB 334. 91 Oregon City School Dist. No. 62 v. Oregon City Education Assn. Case No. C-179-79 (1981) 5 PECBR 4246. 92 Placentia Fire Fighters v. City of Placentia (1976) 57 Cal.App.3d 9, 25 [129 Cal.Rptr. 126]. 93 San Diego Municipal Employees Assn. v. Superior Court (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 1447, 1463–1465 [143 Cal.Rptr.3d 49, 62–64]. 94 Boling v. Public Employment Relations Board (2018) 5 Cal.5th 898. 95 Boling v. Public Employment Relations Board (2018) 5 Cal.5th 898. 96 Sparks Nugget, Inc. v. N.L.R.B. (9th Cir. 1992) 968 F.2d 991, 995. 97 City of Glendale (2012) PERB Decision 2251-M [36 PERC ¶ 157], judicial appeal pending. 98 Operating Engineers Local 3 v. Town of Paradise (2007) PERB Dec. No. 1906-M [31 PERC ¶ 108]. 99 Gov., Code § 3558; County of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles County Employee Relations Com. (2013) 56 Cal.4th 905 [157 Cal.Rptr.3d 481, 301 P.3d 1102]. 100 Gov. Code, § 6254.3, subd. (c). 101 AB 195 codified Gov. Code, § 3506.5. 102 County of Riverside (2012) PERB Decision No. 2280-M [37 PERC ¶ 51]. 103 Gov. Code, § 3505.4. 104 Senate Floor Analysis for AB 1606, November 13, 2012; Gov. Code, § 3505.4. 105 Reinbold v. City of Santa Monica (1976) 63 Cal.App.3d 433, 439-440 [133 Cal.Rptr. 874, 877-879]; Organization of Deputy Sheriffs v. County of San Mateo (1975) 48 Cal.App.3d 331 [122 Cal.Rptr. 210]. 106 Gov. Code, § 3507, subd. (a). 107 See, State of California (1998) PERB Dec. No. 1279-S [22 PERC ¶ 29148]. 108 County of San Bernardino (2018) PERB Decision No. 2556-M [42 PERC ¶ 114]. 109 See, In re Adtranz (2000) 331 NRLB 291 [331 NLRB No. 40], vacated in part (2001) 253 F.3d 19 [the part of

the case dealing with the employer’s right to restrict use of e-mail was affirmed]. 110 See, State of California (1998) PERB Dec. No. 1279-S [22 PERC ¶ 29148]. 111 See, State of California (1998) PERB Dec. No. 1279-S [22 PERC ¶ 29148]. 112 Napa Valley Community College District (2018) PERB Dec. No. 2563-E [42 PERC ¶ 154]. 113 Napa Valley Community College District (2018) PERB Dec. No. 2563-E [42 PERC ¶ 154]. 114 Napa Valley Community College District (2018) PERB Dec. No. 2563-E [42 PERC ¶ 154].

115 Purple Communications, Inc. v. Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO (2014) 361 NLRB No. 126 [2014 WL 6989135], overruling The Guard Publishing Company (2007) 351 NLRB 1110 [351 NLRB No. 70], opinion supplemented (2011) 357 NLRB No. 27.

Labor Relations: The Meet and Confer Process ©2019 (s) Liebert Cassidy Whitmore 83