2017 Mid-Year Meeting Voting & ERP Panels

MEMORANDUM 

Date:  

March 3, 2017 

To: 

AOAC INTERNATIONAL Official Methods Board 

From:  

Deborah McKenzie, Sr. Director, AOAC Standards Development 

Subject: 

Representative Voting Members for SPADA 

BACKGROUND:  Organizational registrants as of March 1, 2017 is as follows: 

Table 1:  Organizational Registrants ATCC 

Medical Countermeasure Systems ‐ Diagnostics 

CBR Defense Concepts and Experimentation Branch,  Naval Surface Warfare Center  DoD ‐ DBPAO (Formerly Critical Reagents Program) 

Neogen Corporation 

NIH/NIAID 

DHS 

NIST 

DHS/OHA 

Northrop Grumman Electronic Systems 

DuPont Nutrition & Health 

PNNL 

FDA ‐ CFSAN (Retired) 

R‐Biopharm Rhone Ltd 

FDA Division Of Microbiology 

US Army Edgewood Chemical Biological Center 

HADECO, LLC 

US ARMY MEDCOM USAMRIID 

JPdM BDS 

US FDA 

Lawrence Livermore National Lab (Retired) 

USAMRIID 

MD Department of Agriculture 

There are several ways to analyze the perspectives of the registrants.  There are three to four major  categories, which are academia, government, industry, and nongovernmental organizations.  Academia  representatives are from educational and research organizations.  Government representatives are from  regulatory agencies including domestic, municipal, federal, and international.    1. Broad perspectives include a view of the registrants in terms of academia, government, industry  and nongovernmental organizations.    2. Specific perspectives include further categorization of registrants by categories of industry,  categories of government, and if necessary by types of academia.  3. Regional perspectives include categorization of registrants by regions of the world and/or  regions of a particular region.