3rd ICAI 2024

International Conference on Automotive Industry 2024

Mladá Boleslav, Czech Republic

References [1] Bauer, C., Hofer, J., Althaus, H. J., Del Duce, A., Simons, A. (2015). The environmental performance of current and future passenger vehicles. Life cycle assessment based on a novel scenario analysis framework, Applied Energy , vol. 157, pp. 871–883. [2] Burchart-Korol D., Jursova S., Folęga P., Pustejovska P. (2020). Life cycle impact assessment of electric vehicle battery charging in European Union countries, Journal of Cleaner Production , vol. 257, doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120476 [3] Cimprich A., Sadayappan K., Young S. (2023) Lightweighting electric vehicles: Scoping review of life cycle assessments, Journal of Cleaner Production , vol. 433, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139692 [4] Directive CSRD – DIRECTIVE (EU) 2022/2464 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as regards corporate sustainability reporting [online]. [cit.2024-02-25]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/ PDF/?uri=CELEX:32022L2464 [5] Environmental Product Declaration Solaris Urbino 18 electric bus The International EPD System [online]. [cit.2024-02-25]. Available at: https://api.environdec.com/ api/v1/EPDLibrary/Files/35c13dfa-4a51-4b99-f48d-08da17f54cd6/Data [6] Folęga P., Burchart D., Marzec P., Jursova S., Pustejovska P. (2022). Potential environmental life cycle impacts of fuel cell electric vehicles powered by hydrogen produced from Polish coke oven gas, Transport Problems , vol. 17 iss. 1 pp.151-161. [7] Joshi A., Sharma R., Baral B. (2022) Comparative life cycle assessment of conventional combustion engine vehicle, battery electric vehicle and fuel cell electric vehicle in Nepal, Journal of Cleaner Production , vol. 379, https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134407 [8] Marsh, E., Allen, S., Hattam, L. (2023) Tackling uncertainty in life cycle assessments for the built environment: A review, Building and Environment , vol. 231, 109941 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109941 [9] Marzocchini, M., Echazarreta, J.M., Gulivart, V., Mathisen, M.L. (2023). Environ- mental Product Declarations worldwide: a case study in Argentina, International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment , vol. 28, pp 955–966 [10] Michalak, J. (2023). Sustainability Assessment of Cementitious Ceramic Tile Adhesives, Buildings , vol. 13, pp.1326–1333 [11] PCR 2016:04 – UN CPC 49112 and 49113 Public and private buses and coaches. Version 2.0 [12] Solaris_Sustainability Report 2020 [online]. [cit.2024-02-25]. Available at: https:// www.solarisbus.com/public/assets/content/firma/esg/Raport_zrownowazonego_ rozwoju_Solaris_2022.pdf [13] The International EPD® System [online]. [cit.2024-02-25]. Available at: http:// www.environdec.com/

26