AOAC OMB Final Action Recommendation (December 2019)-2016.14
2016.14 (October 2019) – FOS-03 MANUSCRIPT
FOR ERP USE ONLY DO NOT DISTRIBUTE
Table 7. Comparison of results with and without blank subtraction 1
Mean with blank subtraction, g/100 g b
Mean without blank subtraction, g/100 g b
P- value c
Significantly different ?
Sample name
n a
SRM 1869 d
12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
0.209
0.217
0.27
No No No No No No No
Adult nutritional RTF e (1) Adult nutritional RTF e (2) Infant formula RTF Child formula powder f
1.28 2.67
1.33 2.78
1.3 2.7
0.300 0.275 0.209 0.032 0.264
0.315 0.286 0.219 0.032 0.278
0.41 0.20 0.18 0.78 0.30
Toddler formula powder milk-based f Infant formula powder FOS/GOS based f Infant formula powder milk based f
No a Number of laboratories considered in the evaluation. All data have been used for the calculation, no outliers removed. 2 b Results are reported in g/100 g of product as consumed (reconstituted or RTF). 3 c T-test 2 sided (hyp=unpaired, equal variance) 4 d Reconstitution rate: 10 g product + 90 g water. 5 e RTF = Ready-to-feed 6 f Reconstitution rate: 25 g product + 200 g water.
7 8
62
Made with FlippingBook HTML5