"A risk assessment of the Piql Services" by FFI

The confidentiality of all the piqlFilms remains intact during the incident, as no one could access the piqlVault while it was still standing. After it was destroyed, the information on the piqlFilms was no longer accessible to the data owner, but neither was it accessible to anybody else.

Confidentiality

Immunity (against attacks on the above mentioned)

The Piql Preservation Services is not immune to attacks against integrity or availability.

Recommendations

The consequences of a doomsday scenario such as this are difficult to mitigate against. The only option is to be realistic and foresighted enough to move the piqlVault out of harm’s way. In this scenario, that would mean out of any major city, and even there one can never be entirely safe from the radioactive fallout. The best protection one can give the piqlVault from a nuclear strike, is placing it in a mountain hall. Yet, even there it might not be safe from a direct hit given the strength of today’s weapons, and probably also the future’s.

Recommended protective measures

References

[50] Glasstone S., Dolan P. J. (eds.) (1977) The Effects of Nuclear Weapons

Relevant literature

[87] Wellerstein, A. (2014) Nukemap

[88] Starr, S. (2005), The Effects of a 300 kiloton Nuclear Warhead Detonated Above Washington, D.C.

163

FFI-RAPPORT 16/00707