A Risk Assessment of Piql Services by FFI

corresponding sensitivity of that information. This could vary greatly from area to area: military secrets are a lot more sensitive, for instance, than a company’s accounting records. The security level surrounding the Piql Preservation Services would vary in equal measure. Before we can make sound recommendations regarding the security level needed to protect the asset, we must first understand the value of the asset in order to analyse what kind of threats it faces and thus what its vulnerabilities are. The value-oriented thinking is therefore paramount to our risk assessment. Based on the discussion above, we present our working definition of a risk assessment. A risk assessment is the overall process of risk identification, risk analysis and risk evaluation. By risk identification we mean first mapping the system which is the object of analysis, here the Piql Preservation Services, followed by finding and describing corresponding risks. The next step, risk analysis, entails assessing the relationship between the intentional threats or unintentional hazards faced by a certain value and the vulnerability of this value against the specified threat or hazard. Lastly, risk evaluation involves determining the level of risk and identifying corresponding measures to reduce the harmful effect [5, 8]. Our emphasis in the PreservIA project is primarily placed on the first two, whereas the risk evaluation will serve to form the basis of further work in later work packages in the PreservIA project. As stated in chapter 1 of the report, our risk assessment will cover the Piql Preservation Service Journey. However, a more in-depth clarification of the scope is necessary, firstly, because we include considerations which go beyond the service journey as explained in detail in chapter 2, and, secondly, because certain aspects of - and stages in – the service journey are not covered by our assessment.

Figure 3.1 The scope of the risk assessment

18

FFI-RAPPORT 16/00707