PJC Business

PJC 106.1

T ORTIOUS I NTERFERENCE

some, more difficult, or of less or no value to the one entitled to performance. AKB Hendrick, LP v. Musgrave Enterprises, Inc. , 380 S.W.3d 221, 236 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2012, no pet.) (citing Tippett v. Hart , 497 S.W.2d 606, 610 (Tex. App.—Amarillo), writ ref’d n.r.e. per curiam , 501 S.W.2d 874 (Tex. 1973)). However, “[o]rdinarily, merely inducing a contract obligor to do what it has a right to do is not actionable interference.” ACS Investors, Inc. v. McLaughlin , 943 S.W.2d 426, 430 (Tex. 1997). Damages. Damages questions are set forth in chapter 115. PJC 115.22 submits actual damages in cases involving existing contracts and in cases involving prospec tive contractual relations. Exemplary damages. For questions submitting exemplary damages, see PJC 115.37 and 115.38 and the Comments accompanying those questions.

288