PJC General Negligence 2024
PJC 18.3
W ORKERS ’ C OMPENSATION —D EFENSES AND E XCEPTIONS
PJC 18.3
Self-Inflicted Injury—Question
PJC 18.3A Self-Inflicted Injury—Question—When Claimant Appeals
QUESTION ______
Was Paul Payne ’s injury not caused by his willful attempt to injure himself ? Answer “Yes” or “No.” Answer: _______________
PJC 18.3B Self-Inflicted Injury—Question—When Carrier Appeals
QUESTION ______
Was Paul Payne ’s injury caused by his willful attempt to injure himself ? Answer “Yes” or “No.” Answer: _______________
COMMENT
When to use. If the evidence raises self-inflicted injury, PJC 18.3 should be sub mitted. See Gregory v. Texas Employers’ Insurance Ass’n , 530 S.W.2d 105 (Tex. 1975); Saunders v. Texas Employers’ Insurance Ass’n , 526 S.W.2d 515, 516–17 (Tex. 1975); Texas Workers’ Compensation Appeal No. 012660 (Dec. 3, 2001). Burden of proof. The burden of proof should be placed appropriately in accor dance with the decision of the appeals panel. See PJC 15.1. Source of question. PJC 18.3 is based on the “self-inflicted injury” exception of Tex. Lab. Code §406.032(1)(B), which provides that the carrier is not liable if the injury “was caused by the employee’s wilful attempt to injure himself.”
266
Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online