PSI - Issue 52
641 17
J.C. Wen et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 52 (2024) 625–646 Author name / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2019) 000 – 000
M N m n
,
2 , ) ( T n T + + + T ( ) ( n T ) + + ( ) u mn m 11 , m 12
( )
u P
=
,
x
0 0 M N 0 0 = = = =
, u mn ( ) ( ) + ( ) ( ) , m n T T T T n 1 11 , m 12 ,
−
m n M N m n
,
2 , ) ( T n T + + + T ( ) ( n T ) + + ( ) u mn m 21 , m 22
( )
u P
=
,
y
0 0 M N = = 0 0 m n = =
, u mn + 1 21 , m 22 , ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) . n m n T T T T
(74)
−
Therefore, we have the following relationship ( ) ( 1 , , 1 ( ) , ( ) x x x y y y k E u u = + = x x
)
(
)
2 , x y + ( ) k E u u x
(75)
,
,
, x x + k E u u
=
, y y
, y x
xy
Static stress intensity factor is determined by
1/2
E
(
)
'
,
(76)
x x y y + − − x x t u t u u t u t d y y
K
0
=
I
2 2(1 ) −
a
'
where
,
. Therefore the transformed stress intensity factor, for a plane strain
y xy + n
y
x xy
y y
t
n
t
n
n
=
=
+
x
x x
problem, yields
E
(
)
(
)
0 t u t u u t u t d + − − 0 0 0
( )
' +
' .
K s
x
y
x
y
u X u Y d +
0
=
(77)
I
x
y
x x
y y
2 2(1 ) −
K a
I
'
'
Consider a circular contour shown in Fig. 3(a), we have
1/2
(2)
n
E
(
)
(78)
,
x x y y n tu tu ut utId y y + − − x x
K
0 2
=
I
(1 ) −
a
1
n
=
(1)
n
2
2
x +
y x
x
x
y
y
y
,
sin
cos ,
sin
cos ,
(79)
I
R
R
R
R
=
=−
+
=−
+
n
where (1)
(2) n indicate the starting and ending angles of block n. The real case transformed stress intensity factor
n and
can be evaluated
(2)
(2)
R
E
n
n
(
)
(
)
0
0
( )
,
(80)
x y y n tu tu ut utId + − − x y y x x
x
y
K s
u X u Y J rdrd +
0
=
+
I
n
2 2(1 ) −
*
aK
1
1
n
n
=
=
I
(1)
(1)
0
n
n
where
n J is Jacobs of block n due to domain transformation.
Made with FlippingBook Annual report maker