EU ANTITRUST: HOT TOPICS & NEXT STEPS

Prague, Czechia

EU ANTITRUST: HOT TOPICS & NEXT STEPS 2022

[15] Judgment of the Court of Justice of the EU of 27 March 2012, Post Danmark I (C209/10), EU:C:2012:172. [16] Judgment of the Court of Justice of the EU of 6 October 2015, Post Danmark II (C23/14), EU:C:2015:651. [17] Judgment of the Court of Justice of the EU of 6 September 2017, Intel (C-413/14 P), EU:C:2017:632. [18] Kupčík, J. (2020). Alternativní způsoby určování tržní síly. Antitrust , Vol. 3, pp. 54–63. [19] Kupčík, J. (2021). Firm’s own price elasticity of demand in dominant position analy sis. To be published. [20] Landes, W. M. and Posner, R. A. (1981). Market Power in Antitrust Cases, Harvard Law Review , Vol. 94, No. 5, pp. 937–996. [21] Lerner, A. P. (1934). The Concept of Monopoly and the Measurement of Monopoly Power, The Review of Economic Studies , Vol. 1, pp. 157–175. [22] Odudu, O. (2006). The Boundaries of EC Competition Law: The Scope of Article 81 . Oxford: Oxford University Press. [23] Posner, R. A. (1976). Antitrust Law: An Economic Perspective . Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [24] Robinson, J. (1933) The Economics of Imperfect Competition. [25] Saving, T. R. (1970). Concentration Ratios and the Degree of Monopoly. Internation al Economic Review , Vol. 11, pp. 139–146. [26] Sousa Ferro, M. (2019). Market Definition in EU Competition Law . Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. [27] Varian, H. R. (2005). Intermediate Microeconomics. Modern Approach . New York: W. W. Norton. [28] Werden, G. J. (1998). Demand Elasticities in Antitrust Analysis. Antitrust Law Jour nal , Vol. 66, pp. 363–414.

449