Microsoft Word - Candidates for 2017 ERP of the Year

149

First Action Recommendation

ER 1 Yes ER 2

Yes, I do recommend the method to be adopted as First Action Method by ERP after authors have explained the following two limitation of the method in application. 1. The method in the current format is not be easily applicable to foods/feeds high in phenolic compounds (e.g. beets, red sorghum grain). 2. Oats beta-glucan interfere in the assay and provide values above LOD = 0.31 +/- 0.09%. ER 3 Yes. Recommend consideration of allowing HPLC as an option to measure liberated glucose to calculate %dietary starch. This approach would also measure free, inherent glucose and track if sucrose-digestion has occurred. ER 4 Yes ER 5 Yes. ER 6 Yes ER 7 yes ER 8 Yes Recommend consideration of allowing HPLC as an option to measure liberated glucose to calculate %dietary starch. This approach would also measure free, inherent glucose and track if sucrose- digestion has occurred. Decision needed if single or multiple lab work is needed to verify. ER 4 Just the normal 2 year feedback period. Collaborative is completed and complete. ER 5 N/A ER 6 It would be good to test the performance of the method when an alternative glucose assay is used. Clarify the reason why dextrin recovery is low. ER 7 no ER 8 That included in the text above. (Please clarify) After First Action Recommendation ER 1 Use feedback ER 2 NA ER 3

03/12/2018