Microsoft Word - Candidates for 2017 ERP of the Year

228

General Comments (3) Editorial ER 1 NA ER 2 NA ER 3

I am concerned that this method, having come from AACC International has not been approved yet by the technical committees of AACCI. This ERP should wait until after AACC has vetted the data and report before considering first action on this method.

ER 4 ER 5 ER 6 ER 7 ER 8

Some editing needed in tables and use of gluten / gliadin (gluten = 2 x gliadin)

The method is provided is in a good format with enough details.

NA NA

03/12/2018

Made with FlippingBook Online newsletter