Privacy Issues in the Community College Workplace

The employee filed suit against the investigator, the District, and worker’s compensation insurer alleging, among other things, violations of her constitutional rights to privacy and of Civil Code section 1708.8. The Court of Appeal held that under Government Code section 821.6, public employees are granted immunity for instituting or prosecuting judicial or administrative proceeding within the scope of their employment, even if their conduct is malicious and without probable cause. The investigation was initiated during the worker’s compensation case and was therefore part of judicial and administrative proceedings subject to section 821.6 immunity. Sanders v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. 459 The California Supreme Court upheld a damage award against ABC news after one of its reporters went undercover as an employee and videotaped private conversations between co-workers. The video was later shown on ABC and an employee sued. The Court held that the employee had an expectation that his comments would not be made public, even though the comments were made in a setting in which other employees could hear the comments. Ops.Cal. Atty Gen No. 12-110 460 The California Attorney General has issued an opinion that continuous videotaping surveillance of commercial drivers did not constitute a misdemeanor under Labor Code section 1051, when the video file is inspected by a third party who is an agent of the driver’s employer and the videotape surveillance is for the sole benefit of the driver’s employer.

The manner of surveillance and the area under surveillance may also play a role in determining whether a privacy interest is invoked in the workplace. As a result, employers are advised to consult with legal counsel to review their video surveillance procedures and policies in the workplace.

Education Code Section 78907 prohibits the use by any person, including a student, of any electronic listening or recording device in any classroom without the prior consent of the instructor. The only exception is to provide accommodation to disabled students.

LCW Practice Advisor

In addition, an educational institution cannot simply install security cameras without providing notice and an opportunity for the relevant employee associations to bargain and negotiate the effects of a decision to install security cameras. 461 This is the case regardless as to whether the cameras are overt or covert and whether the cameras are install in public or private portions of the premises. 462 While there are limitations on what recording an employer can do at the workplace, there are also limitations on what types of recordings an employer can prohibit of employees in a workplace. In the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) decision Whole Foods Market,

Privacy Issues in the Community College Workplace ©2019 (c) Liebert Cassidy Whitmore 146