SPIFAN ERP Final Action Review (June 9, 2017)

120-121 / 123

AOAC INTERNATIONAL
SPIFAN Nutrients ERP
Final Action Review (June 19, 2017)
First Name Last Name E-mail Address ERP Final Recommendation
to the OMB
Comments: ERP Final Recommendation to
the OMB 2
Comments: 2
Martine van Gool I recommend AOAC 2016.02
(final version)
I recommend AOAC 2016.05
(final version)
Jinchuan Yang I recommend AOAC 2016.02
(final version)
I recommend AOAC 2016.05
(final version)
Donald Gilliland I recommend AOAC 2016.02
(final version)
No comments. The method document as written is
acceptable as Final Action Method
I recommend AOAC 2016.05
(final version)
No comments. The method document as written is
acceptable as Final Action Method
John Austad I recommend AOAC 2016.02
(final version)
I recommend AOAC 2016.05
(final version)
Estela Kneeteman I recommend AOAC 2016.02
(final version)
I recommend AOAC 2016.05
(final version)
Esther Campos Gimenez I recommend AOAC 2016.02
(final version)
I recommend AOAC 2016.05
(final version)
Darryl Suliivan I recommend AOAC 2016.02
(final version)
I recommend AOAC 2016.05
(final version)
Adrienne Mc Mahon I recommend AOAC 2016.02
(final version)
Hi,
I recommend this version following some minor editing for
OMB review and approval.
I have done some minor editing throughout the document but
will send a copy to George and cc Delia
Best Regards
Adrienne
I recommend AOAC 2016.05
(final version)
Hi, I recommend this version for OMB review and approval.
One comment - I would prefer if per 100g (powder or RTF)
was used to report results rather than per hg-1 or dL-1.
Best Regards
Adrienne
Brendon Gill I recommend AOAC 2016.02
(final version)
Changes made to describe back-flushing in sample
preparation appear in Final Action method in online web book
(although not in email pdf attachment). This method
completely MLT successfully and should be Final Action.
I recommend AOAC 2016.05
(final version)
There is no abstention button, so have clicked approve
although it should be noted that this is our method.
Melissa Phillips I recommend AOAC 2016.02
(final version)
I recommend AOAC 2016.05
(final version)
David Woollard I recommend AOAC 2016.02
(final version)
2016.02 has proved itself through the MLT to be reliable and I
must accept this. However, I have had problems running the
test because of the detection issues of biotin at low
wavelength. Equipment available to me was very old so this
problem might not occur elsewhere. However, the ERP
should be vigilant about the long-term robustness of the
method.
Options for the future are to add a derivatisation step with
avidin to create a fluorescence or to use MS detection.
I recommend AOAC 2016.05
(final version)
This method is a major step forward in vitamin D analysis.
Previous methodology using LC-UVD has been hampered by
interferences, even when semi-prep clean-up is
implemented.