Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  17 / 80 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 17 / 80 Next Page
Page Background

17

The model integrates data from satellite imagery as well

as land use changes from the IMAGE model, including

human population density and growth, resource abundance

and exploration, pollution, climate change and many other

additional factors (see Alkemade

et al.

2009 for review and

www.globio.info

).

Figure 1:

African elephant range and population density.

The African Elephant Database is managed by the

IUCN/SSC African Elephant Specialist Group and is

a collaborative effort between conservation agencies

and researchers in African elephant range States. Infor­

mation on elephant distribution and abundance is col-

lected through field surveys and questionnaires, and

stored in the African Elephant Database. In the past,

every three to five years, the data on elephant popula-

tions and range have been assembled and presented in

an African Elephant Status Report. Four such reports

have been published and these reports are recognized

as the most reliable and authoritative data on elephant

populations in Africa. Shifting to an online interface in

2012, and including data on the Asian elephant from the

IUCN/SSC Asian Elephant Specialist Group, the African

and Asian Elephant Database will now publish annual

updates on the status of the African elephant. The on-

line database also includes the latest submissions of

data for individual elephant populations as they come

in, providing up to date information to the public at the

population level.

The African Elephant Database

http://elephantdatabase.org

Range and habitat loss are the

most significant long-term threats

to the African elephant’s survival.

For calculations of impacted range, actual estimates of the ele­

phant range were based on the distribution of the ranges classed

as “known” and “possible” (Fig. 1) (Blanc

et al.

2007). To better

illustrate regional pressures, a wider area beyond the ranges

shown in Fig. 1 and 2 is given. From an ecological perspective,

the consequences of the projected habitat loss would be dire,

with serious economic implications for the countries concerned.

Currently, an estimated 29 per cent of the area defined as cur-

rent “known” and “possible” elephant range (see Blanc

et al.

2007 for definition of range) is classified as heavily impacted

by human development. This may rise to 63 per cent in the next

40 years, leaving the ranges in Southern Africa mostly intact. If

this is combined with poaching, elephant ranges will likely be

greatly reduced in parts of Eastern Africa and the elephant may

be eradicated locally across parts of Central and West Africa.