Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  48-49 / 84 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 48-49 / 84 Next Page
Page Background

BALKAN VITAL GRAPHICS

48

BACKGROUND

MINING

WATER

NATURE

49

Adapting to international rules

All the Balkan countries are now committed to the Eu-

ropean integration progress, with the goal of joining the

European Union. They must consequently accept the

acquis communautaire

and transpose it into their

national legislation. One major challenge – and not just

for new member states – is the Water Framework Di-

rective, which introduces new rules for water manage-

ment hinging on river basins.

On joining Europe, a country automatically accepts the

terms of all international treaties to which the EU is part.

In the case of the UNECE conventions, this means that

Balkan countries must comply with them even if they

have not actually ratified them. Serbia, for example,

complies with the Espoo Convention and the Strategic

Environmental Assessment Protocol without being part

to either. The same is true of the Aarhus convention.

But Balkan countries would benefit by signing up to

international treaties already ratified by the EU, particu-

larly as doing so would strengthen their environmental

policies and commitments at a national level and serve

as a framework for transboundary cooperation on en-

vironmental damage and hazards. The UN Convention

on the Law of Non-Navigational Uses of International

Watercourses is yet another case in point. To accept

the principles underpinning international instruments

protecting the environment and water resources, and

to work within their framework would surely bring ben-

efits, stability and security to the Balkans.

How Balkan countries go about complying with EU re-

quirements in this respect depends on how successful

they are in changing the national water management

systems they inherited from the socialist era. This

means accepting new, and in the most part very ad-

vanced, approaches to water management, which in-

volve active co-operation with neighbouring countries

sharing a river basin. Over the last 12 years, all Balkan

countries, except Serbia, have passed new water legis-

lation, replacing outdated water management methods

and facing up to future challenges.

The body of EU legislation which candidate countries must adopt to

become EU members.

Convention

on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Trans-

boundary Context (EIA, Espoo Convention, Espoo 1991)

Convention

on the Transboundary Effects of Industrial Ac-

cidents (Helsinki 1992)

Convention

on the Protection and Use of Transboundary

Watercourses and International Lakes (Water Convention,

Helsinki 1992)

Convention

on Access to Information, Public Participation

in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmen-

tal Matters (Aarhus Convention, Aarhus 1998)

Protocol

on Water and Health (London 1999)

Protocol

on Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA

Protocol, Kiev 2003)

Protocol

on Civil Liability and Compensation for Damage

Caused by Transboundary Effects of Industrial Accidents

on Transboundary Waters (Kiev 2003)

Protocol

on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers

(PRTR Protocol, Kiev 2003)

Water-related multilateral agreements

facilitated by the United Nations

Economic Commission for Europe

Maritsa

Bulgaria GreeceTurkey

Drina

Montenegro Bosnia-Herzegovina

Serbia

Sava

Slovenia Croatia Bosnia-Herzegovina Serbia

Tundzha

BulgariaTurkey

Vardar Axios

Macedonia Greece

Kolpa Kupa

Slovenia Croatia

Mesta Nestos

Bulgaria Greece

Struma Strimonas

Bulgaria Greece

Serbia Macedonia

Vardar Axios

Macedonia Greece

Ergene Evros

Turkey Greece

Arda

Bulgaria Greece

Una

Croatia Bosnia-Herzegovina

Neretva

Bosnia-Herzegovina Croatia

Drin

Albania Macedonia Serbia

Vardar Axios

Macedonia Greece